Return-path: <52829-93744-396881-12452-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.lessono.za.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 02:28:41 -0700 Received: from [141.11.190.58] (port=54595 helo=town.lessono.za.com) by d05c5d92ccf2 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <52829-93744-396881-12452-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.lessono.za.com>) id 1o4fcE-003LQI-AQ for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 02:28:39 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=lessono.za.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=DiabetesReversal@lessono.za.com; bh=FnWKg5uZh42iFQTTnrEPCoMQY2s=; b=eFcSTGVFWyS5z8L9Gbw6Vb3tJ4mHwXK7KYyZVoaDE82ejwHpzHxBUA0E19XMb7zmI4xK3CAjLcx5 b85VJlV/L+gorC2ai0n9oGlVFp6qkcCRLbdeX8PblTawUhSmj0YZHODwDYPrhWTAMelDW8i2askd ExhLlzaKpXIExNZ7g7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=lessono.za.com; b=0g0NjgsqBMftSUfT4651Bvb32DcXUCSkGMHC8GPVE7wMsqND0VfNvdm8xGdmJuu605HAANCTJKc2 UCdajAKf3Iy4UsUgckMEwAty6boI1EaITg1bzHZJkwaTtV5lriCSysl2g+2MmPWsHw1jtMmXKmlH uIKnAqhnejdKDbJiwmY=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4d5d9504478a8fa3cd5faf48b6822cce_16e30_60e51" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 05:28:35 -0400 From: "Diabetes Reversal" Reply-To: "Diabetes Reversal" Subject: Urgent news about Metformin To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.9 X-Spam_score_int: 49 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bcda1c85505f", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Urgent news about Metformin http://lessono.za.com/QngKf1LWj9TkBKqWymBrBXEYSfgtUToYHkrTd2xuaDCSOZqp1A http://lessono.za.com/x_SRUohXvQTWC0MhNFODFWkStcToDDRV4G9PDCssZ724iK8SdQ Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99% [score: 0.9660] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: lessono.za.com] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lessono.za.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --4d5d9504478a8fa3cd5faf48b6822cce_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Urgent news about Metformin http://lessono.za.com/QngKf1LWj9TkBKqWymBrBXEYSfgtUToYHkrTd2xuaDCSOZqp1A http://lessono.za.com/x_SRUohXvQTWC0MhNFODFWkStcToDDRV4G9PDCssZ724iK8SdQ Hofmeister discovered the changes occurring in the embryo-sac of flowering plants, and determined the correct relationships of these to the Cryptogamia. This fixed the position of Gymnosperms as a class distinct from Dicotyledons, and the term Angiosperm then gradually came to be accepted as the suitable designation for the whole of the flowering plants other than Gymnosperms, including the classes of Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons. This is the sense in which the term is used today. In most taxonomies, the flowering plants are treated as a coherent group. The most popular descriptive name has been Angiospermae, with Anthophyta (lit. 'flower-plants') a second choice (both unranked). The Wettstein system and Engler system treated them as a subdivision (Angiospermae). The Reveal system also treated them as a subdivision (Magnoliophytina), but later split it to Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida, and Rosopsida. The Takhtajan system and Cronquist system treat them as a division (Magnoliophyta).[citation needed] The Dahlgren system and Thorne system (1992) treat them as a class (Magnoliopsida). The APG system of 1998, and the later 2003 and 2009 revisions, treat the flowering plants as an unranked clade without a formal Latin name (angiosperms). A formal classification was published alongside the 2009 revision in which the flowering plants rank as a subclass (Magnoliidae). The internal classification of this group has undergone considerable revision. The Cronquist system, proposed by Arthur Cronquist in 1968 and published in its full form in 1981, is still widely used but is no longer believed to accurately reflect phylogeny. A consensus about how the flowering plants should be arranged has re --4d5d9504478a8fa3cd5faf48b6822cce_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
Doctors are urging every American with type II diabetes to read this trending news story:



Why doctors in the know no longer prescribe Metformin

To your health,

Jim Gray, Editor
Vibrant Health News










Hofmeister discovered the changes occurring in the embryo-sac of flowering plants, and determined the correct relationships of these to the Cryptogamia. This fixed the position of Gymnosperms as a class distinct from Dicotyledons, and the term Angiosperm then gradually came to be accepted as the suitable designation for the whole of the flowering plants other than Gymnosperms, including the classes of Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons. This is the sense in which the term is used today. In most taxonomies, the flowering plants are treated as a coherent group. The most popular descriptive name has been Angiospermae, with Anthophyta (lit. 'flower-plants') a second choice (both unranked). The Wettstein system and Engler system treated them as a subdivision (Angiospermae). The Reveal system also treated them as a subdivision (Magnoliophytina), but later split it to Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida, and Rosopsida. The Takhtajan system and Cronquist system treat them as a division (Magnoliophyta).[citation needed] The Dahlgren system and Thorne system (1992) treat them as a class (Magnoliopsida). The APG system of 1998, and the later 2003 and 2009 revisions, treat the flowering plants as an unranked clade without a formal Latin name (angiosperms). A formal classification was published alongside the 2009 revision in which the flowering plants rank as a subclass (Magnoliidae). The internal classification of this group has undergone considerable revision. The Cronquist system, proposed by Arthur Cronquist in 1968 and published in its full form in 1981, is still widely used but is no longer believed to accurately reflect phylogeny. A consensus about how the flowering plants should be arranged has re










  --4d5d9504478a8fa3cd5faf48b6822cce_16e30_60e51--