Return-path: <53147-93744-396881-13188-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.dominately.ru.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 05:38:19 -0700 Received: from [141.11.190.154] (port=53595 helo=plano.dominately.ru.com) by d05c5d92ccf2 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <53147-93744-396881-13188-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.dominately.ru.com>) id 1o7cO7-00498a-TW for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 05:38:17 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=dominately.ru.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=ClearVision@dominately.ru.com; bh=anGqTllG42qsqlMOGzz75BYKFo0=; b=J1oxGuCrYwIzLfHDpZTiRkVyDU+AMZ8IYjW/O9COhaTAOvGLAeyvDb6DqmmL7InKYjVmSWopR+zQ dlWj9OW8dzRv0NuHNCI9ksY0d/GkcaiI844hDE4CL4pCSoNfDmOjZzOWnPDzejWvFtOJAYH9EPG5 s8McS1mMZaeyD8mZNLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=dominately.ru.com; b=RXilxGohy8uhbIRgNYKHQVj0jIuQf9gD5H3+mWnzD29tJRgnIN1S/V6QtVgskl5t0rGWdVe7HNqe dlXvaEZMz1UWRt6Okqc6MJQDsVB4O70t7upwaugyY8j3gHGKW2vxyPWrdy2kBIV3bm31KDHLGMFI ttQ/CQvUsY4oOvCt6sk=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="dcd3527d808f62bdce109259ef932351_16e30_60e51" Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 08:31:57 -0400 From: "Blurry Eyesight" Reply-To: "Vision Enhancing" Subject: little-known trick clears blurry eyesight To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.7 X-Spam_score_int: 27 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bcda1c85505f", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: little-known trick clears blurry eyesight http://dominately.ru.com/wDl-9Uo2XgKVaVI6GFHZUj1xLhxpTVeRKbZQnFyf3erw_Qae2g http://dominately.ru.com/W0H-jDncA5eZLblbbjy5ZPhvd8gaLHDKTcJAv2Bjf4UD64Urig Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: dominately.ru.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [141.11.190.154 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: dominately.ru.com] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --dcd3527d808f62bdce109259ef932351_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit little-known trick clears blurry eyesight http://dominately.ru.com/wDl-9Uo2XgKVaVI6GFHZUj1xLhxpTVeRKbZQnFyf3erw_Qae2g http://dominately.ru.com/W0H-jDncA5eZLblbbjy5ZPhvd8gaLHDKTcJAv2Bjf4UD64Urig s of publicly editable wiki systems argue that these systems could be easily tampered with by malicious individuals ("vandals") or even by well-meaning but unskilled users who introduce errors into the content, while proponents maintain that the community of users can catch such malicious or erroneous content and correct it. Lars Aronsson, a data systems specialist, summarizes the controversy as follows: "Most people when they first learn about the wiki concept, assume that a Web site that can be edited by anybody would soon be rendered useless by destructive input. It sounds like offering free spray cans next to a grey concrete wall. The only likely outcome would be ugly graffiti and simple tagging and many artistic efforts would not be long lived. Still, it seems to work very well." High editorial standards in medicine and health sciences articles, in which users typically use peer-reviewed journals or university textbooks as sources, have led to the idea of expert-moderated wikis. Some wikis allow one to link to specific versions of articles, which has been useful to the scientific community, in that expert peer reviewers could analyse articles, improve them and provide links to the trusted version of that article. Noveck points out that "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested int --dcd3527d808f62bdce109259ef932351_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
Dear,

Your doctor lied to you…

You do NOT need new glasses or eye surgery for crystal clear vision.

Do THIS instead…

Then do literally nothing else.

No eye-injections. No glasses. And no ludicrous eye-exercises needed.

Just do THIS in the morning...

And be amazed…

As your high-definition, 20/20 vision returns.

This breakthrough sent shockwaves in the medical community. Big Pharma canceled the doctor who discovered this vision-enhancing discovery.

Because they’ll do anything to make sure adults need glasses to see.

Watch this presentation before it’s taken down…



To your health,

David Cooper















s of publicly editable wiki systems argue that these systems could be easily tampered with by malicious individuals ("vandals") or even by well-meaning but unskilled users who introduce errors into the content, while proponents maintain that the community of users can catch such malicious or erroneous content and correct it. Lars Aronsson, a data systems specialist, summarizes the controversy as follows: "Most people when they first learn about the wiki concept, assume that a Web site that can be edited by anybody would soon be rendered useless by destructive input. It sounds like offering free spray cans next to a grey concrete wall. The only likely outcome would be ugly graffiti and simple tagging and many artistic efforts would not be long lived. Still, it seems to work very well." High editorial standards in medicine and health sciences articles, in which users typically use peer-reviewed journals or university textbooks as sources, have led to the idea of expert-moderated wikis. Some wikis allow one to link to specific versions of articles, which has been useful to the scientific community, in that expert peer reviewers could analyse articles, improve them and provide links to the trusted version of that article. Noveck points out that "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested int





--dcd3527d808f62bdce109259ef932351_16e30_60e51--\