Return-path: <54112-93744-396881-13403-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.walmartsurveys.sa.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 04:59:49 -0700 Received: from [146.19.215.222] (port=43672 helo=elara.walmartsurveys.sa.com) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <54112-93744-396881-13403-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.walmartsurveys.sa.com>) id 1oHOeg-000VAY-S2 for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 04:59:48 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=walmartsurveys.sa.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=WalmartShopperGiftCardChance@walmartsurveys.sa.com; bh=nTx5qDZCtkNd8p0sqIKo4YcPoos=; b=psHfieWYKimuH16njgpkan0DFKuLUAXGyX1WEwOA7PJ27QV3uMsk9cFHIUqZjmSJc371ixzUdxG0 Xyp2c3tVXSWk3JFafHgIcS4/yoQxnrmZvAdKDbsNL7QgPU/d8+LIffsL1A0uxzOpHmMLio7PTbTQ b9+CyDccdqQ5VZOiHGw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=walmartsurveys.sa.com; b=cA+UQHOc37wj9H6BeuZnqAiT54VfWRTghpQ5dMXZvu+WXkR9xqtnfnisNcPZiCAP+sy4+PDFCkt/ u2UuBZbVi90/EB6hp5ZfGmdVJP62o815vMONcrIXwhQiOTMKNJAsnXB5CltKZbi3oSf1aJoeIjv+ UDZ7/nWkDdxbaIXIU2g=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="96a764c19b8f6939c339b6e1426c7c7c_16e30_60e51" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 06:51:43 -0400 From: "Walmart Shopper Gift Card Chance" Reply-To: "Walmart Opinion Requested" Subject: Shopper, You can qualify to get a $100 Walmart gift card! To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Shopper, You can qualify to get a $100 Walmart gift card! http://walmartsurveys.sa.com/MRjbntlVvd9mS3DaUjebZTjBb2kByg_DjvVYzWUbhar9mLnG_A http://walmartsurveys.sa.com/GQFeCp3-rgvxCHcmtpUrInUF61b326OqO4USWHpDolqt11U9Cw Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: walmartsurveys.sa.com] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: walmartsurveys.sa.com] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [146.19.215.222 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [146.19.215.222 listed in psbl.surriel.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --96a764c19b8f6939c339b6e1426c7c7c_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Shopper, You can qualify to get a $100 Walmart gift card! http://walmartsurveys.sa.com/MRjbntlVvd9mS3DaUjebZTjBb2kByg_DjvVYzWUbhar9mLnG_A http://walmartsurveys.sa.com/GQFeCp3-rgvxCHcmtpUrInUF61b326OqO4USWHpDolqt11U9Cw nauts during a launch pad test, threw NASA's schedules into further question – even though AS-501 was uncrewed, NASA officials wanted to closely examine its CSM. NASA had planned to restack the vehicle once this was done, but instead the inspections that took place found a total of 1,407 errors in the spacecraft. Inspectors found many haphazardly routed and skinned wires, prime material for short circuits. A tall rocket on a platform is rolled out along a track towards a launch site The Apollo 4 launch vehicle (right) is rolled out from the Vehicle Assembly Building (far left) past the Mobile Servicing Structure. Other problems were discovered, such as the discovery of an errant bolt in one of the J-2 engines. (NASA was concerned not only with retrieving the surplus hardware, but with discovering how it got there.) A meeting in March 1967, with Phillips in attendance, disclosed twelve hundred problems with the Saturn V, which the technicians proposed to deal with at the rate of eighty per day. While the CSM was undergoing repairs, the spacer was removed from the vehicle stack, and the S-II positioned. On May 24 it was announced that the S-II would be removed for inspection following the discovery of hairline cracks in another S-II then being constructed, this work being completed by mid-June, after which the CSM was also returned to the stack, the first time the launch vehicle and spacecraft had been fully assembled. It was rolled out to LC-39 on August 26, 1967, where it was joined by the Mobile Servicing Structure that allowed access to the launch vehicle and spacecraft two days later, also transported by crawler. This was the first time a NASA spacecraft had been assembled away from its launch site, something allowing protection from Florida's hot and humid climate for equipment and personnel. The countdown demonstration test had been scheduled for September 20 but was soon rescheduled for the 25th and did not begin until the evening of the 27th. By October 2 another two days had been lost to delays, but by October 4 it reached launch minus 45 minutes. Then a computer failed, and the count, reset to minus 13 hours before launch, resumed on October 9. More computer and equipment problems appeared. By then, the launch team was exhausted and --96a764c19b8f6939c339b6e1426c7c7c_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
Special Offer!
Congratulations!

You've been selected to receive an EXCLUSIVE OFFER!
Complete this short 30-second survey about your experiences with

Walmart

and receive your exclusive reward offer for participating.
 



 
nauts during a launch pad test, threw NASA's schedules into further question – even though AS-501 was uncrewed, NASA officials wanted to closely examine its CSM. NASA had planned to restack the vehicle once this was done, but instead the inspections that took place found a total of 1,407 errors in the spacecraft. Inspectors found many haphazardly routed and skinned wires, prime material for short circuits. A tall rocket on a platform is rolled out along a track towards a launch site The Apollo 4 launch vehicle (right) is rolled out from the Vehicle Assembly Building (far left) past the Mobile Servicing Structure. Other problems were discovered, such as the discovery of an errant bolt in one of the J-2 engines. (NASA was concerned not only with retrieving the surplus hardware, but with discovering how it got there.) A meeting in March 1967, with Phillips in attendance, disclosed twelve hundred problems with the Saturn V, which the technicians proposed to deal with at the rate of eighty per day. While the CSM was undergoing repairs, the spacer was removed from the vehicle stack, and the S-II positioned. On May 24 it was an












nounced that the S-II would be removed for inspection following the discovery of hairline cracks in another S-II then being constructed, this work being completed by mid-June, after which the CSM was also returned to the stack, the first time the launch vehicle and spacecraft had been fully assembled. It was rolled out to LC-39 on August 26, 1967, where it was joined by the Mobile Servicing Structure that allowed access to the launch vehicle and spacecraft two days later, also transported by crawler. This was the first time a NASA spacecraft had been assembled away from its launch site, something allowing protection from Florida's hot and humid climate for equipment and personnel. The countdown demonstration test had been scheduled for September 20 but was soon rescheduled for the 25th and did not begin until the evening of the 27th. By October 2 another two days had been lost to delays, but by October 4 it reached launch minus 45 minutes. Then a computer failed, and the count, reset to minus 13 hours before launch, resumed on October 9. More computer and equipment problems appeared. By then, the launch team was exhausted and





















 
--96a764c19b8f6939c339b6e1426c7c7c_16e30_60e51--