Return-path: <55373-93744-396881-8505-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.foundo.za.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 04:11:55 -0700 Received: from [23.247.47.137] (port=40429 helo=kale.foundo.za.com) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <55373-93744-396881-8505-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.foundo.za.com>) id 1oUR45-002n69-0t for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 04:11:54 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=foundo.za.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=HomeDepotShopperFeedback@foundo.za.com; bh=SGL9NxQDdYCehdQU8u9dLgadsM4=; b=Oo8jD5oF4X+YPQnxoFYueYI20n8x6aRx8un+SiWZxb07a2D8Xl0nbwSvFR10v4ljpJ9sjl9JApd6 dj91QVpJTKrbOACN+uWImBfu0pAbJfWwsRT0PgL4VxkAGNFP0SeYCKMvFpBxHN8OEpA7gguUjmwq A/IX8sHl5dIGtc3CIyI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=foundo.za.com; b=Smax48OA32VWgwUZYCZb55fAqPE8+VKduQly/Pc2Dr0Pmdm5cgO9ursSPOz9AQvLirF2klR9+fq6 LJrTZuAc3bbxG7LJyebuIsMQHBgKHz/Gs3abSKNoXD90+Rxn4yL1C0/vLGX6h78nmQ4fjueclNaT 6d4NcxKyQlXGmn/z83U=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="061d6fbedca291e34b9bb7d6c6c9bbf1_16e30_60e51" Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 06:22:32 -0400 From: "Home Depot Opinion Requested" Reply-To: "Home Depot Opinion Requested" Subject: BONUS: $100 HOME DEPOT Gift Card Opportunity To: Message-ID: <6osqm4q4ftaptw8x-z7xsuw16jvajic0k-16e30-60e51@foundo.za.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.3 X-Spam_score_int: 3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: BONUS: $100 HOME DEPOT Gift Card Opportunity http://foundo.za.com/UU_YFtnVSGsVRNy8h5eQ2dkuo0RmW3SUR6pge8HZNzzEos2S http://foundo.za.com/ofrcGgw-ar_u9GWTTwG14p4ZSUcppWNSCOziH8YO5Y-epuGS Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: foundo.za.com] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: foundo.za.com] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [23.247.47.137 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [23.247.47.137 listed in psbl.surriel.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --061d6fbedca291e34b9bb7d6c6c9bbf1_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit BONUS: $100 HOME DEPOT Gift Card Opportunity http://foundo.za.com/UU_YFtnVSGsVRNy8h5eQ2dkuo0RmW3SUR6pge8HZNzzEos2S http://foundo.za.com/ofrcGgw-ar_u9GWTTwG14p4ZSUcppWNSCOziH8YO5Y-epuGS n March 1955, Tendeloo debated equal pay in the House of Representatives. In a column in the newspaper Het Vrije Volk, she argued that the women's rights movement had begun advocating equal pay in 1898 and made their case at the League of Nations, the United Nations and ultimately the International Labour Organization, which in 1951 adopted the Equal Remuneration Convention. The Dutch government accepted equal pay in principle but opposed ratification and execution on the grounds that the pay gap of 30 per cent should be closed over time and not at once. Tendeloo argued that the convention did not require an immediate closure of the pay gap. She and three other female members agreed with the government that introduction should be gradual; Tendeloo suggested over eight years. The government also claimed it was up to the private sector to prioritise equal pay; Tendeloo argued that anything involving women's rights would end up at the bottom of the priority list. When the government said that equal pay would harm the economy, Tendeloo pointed out that if ever there was a time to deal with the cost of social justice, it was while the economy was growing. Tendeloo submitted a motion, with six others, calling on the government to ratify and execute the Equal Remuneration Convention as quickly as possible. The motion passed with 47 votes in favour and 39 against, with crucial votes in favour coming from Christine Wttewaall van Stoetwegen's party, the Christian Historical Union (CHU). The government did not act up --061d6fbedca291e34b9bb7d6c6c9bbf1_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
BONUS: $100 HOME DEPOT Gift Card Opportunity













 
n March 1955, Tendeloo debated equal pay in the House of Representatives. In a column in the newspaper Het Vrije Volk, she argued that the women's rights movement had begun advocating equal pay in 1898 and made their case at the League of Nations, the United Nations and ultimately the International Labour Organization, which in 1951 adopted the Equal Remuneration Convention. The Dutch government accepted equal pay in principle but opposed ratification and execution on the grounds that the pay gap of 30 per cent should be closed over time and not at once. Tendeloo argued that the convention did not require an immediate closure of the pay gap. She and three other female members agreed with the government that introduction should be gradual; Tendeloo suggested over eight years. The government also claimed it was up to the private sector to prioritise equal pay; Tendeloo argued that anything involving women's rights would end up at the bottom of the priority list. When the government said that equal pay would harm the economy, Tendeloo pointed out that if ever there was a time to deal with the cost of social justice, it was while the economy was growing. Tendeloo submitted a motion, with six others, calling on the government to ratify and execute the Equal Remuneration Convention as quickly as possible. The motion passed with 47 votes in favour and 39 against, with crucial votes in favour coming from Christine Wttewaall van Stoetwegen's party, the Christian Historical Union (CHU). The government did not act up



















 
--061d6fbedca291e34b9bb7d6c6c9bbf1_16e30_60e51--