Return-path: <55697-93744-396881-13616-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.descendary.ru.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 05:04:43 -0700 Received: from [23.247.2.244] (port=49953 helo=rico.descendary.ru.com) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <55697-93744-396881-13616-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.descendary.ru.com>) id 1oXiB2-003PXa-7T for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 05:04:41 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=descendary.ru.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=AmazingDeals@descendary.ru.com; bh=xFdw5OOJKb1NujWeXQefLTraQmw=; b=kqCCUQRzibkR0am8YG0ouBOV3nA7fP0wY27OtcGfCyQI7zFRhTOHKr5ouLcGLdXltPIIApzMUVtZ 6VONRA+KzzEIEfseqjwOGygIAEbQd+t28yEsMeX2dxcSISAQLApEVv0A8WIvcW7AOOxhwDr6KmtC az1cGQmfM82eDovQmoU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=descendary.ru.com; b=Uasp4wFZK1I8cMkK60ogPQNC9nVF4KhqnODxSkqJwVGdkVIZAw8waVXIXo0HpsR0lC9Y4LNx61UT B++ci/bok5axHRM10ht4gjmpb8gXUWvttQSWtlRrtwVpZ2GX+9mWWgR+2R7u0p2EZ9bZ2q3LwEOy r2d1MTCopcfpJy8mNAs=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20c20f3ddb3d27b4e51eda186061780f_16e30_60e51" Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:04:16 -0400 From: "URGENT Notification" Reply-To: "You're Invited" Subject: We have been trying to reach you - Please respond! To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.1 X-Spam_score_int: 31 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: We have been trying to reach you - Please respond! http://descendary.ru.com/y0_KpO61cpa6V9mAMd2NlkI8rHoyFIDDPSewQEOop13fwawFrQ http://descendary.ru.com/B0k3NKgK3O_MQPJv9_S6ij2CexZWpVQYjlO9iIpMqYPPfX8JQA Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: descendary.ru.com] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: descendary.ru.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --20c20f3ddb3d27b4e51eda186061780f_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We have been trying to reach you - Please respond! http://descendary.ru.com/y0_KpO61cpa6V9mAMd2NlkI8rHoyFIDDPSewQEOop13fwawFrQ http://descendary.ru.com/B0k3NKgK3O_MQPJv9_S6ij2CexZWpVQYjlO9iIpMqYPPfX8JQA stated that the lawsuits were not filed right away because Magnavox and Sanders needed to wait until they could expect to be awarded more money than it would cost to pursue the suits. The root of the conflict was a set of patents by Baer and the development team—particularly a pair which described how the Odyssey showed player-controlled objects, or dots, on a video monitor and described a number of games that could be played with the system, with one patent by Baer and one by Rusch. The judge, John Grady, ruled in early 1977 that Baer's patent for the Odyssey constituted "the pioneering patent of the video game art", held the defendants' games as infringing, and set a precedent that any video game where a machine-controlled visual element hit and bounced off a player-controlled element violated Rusch's patent. At the time of judgement, only Seeburg Corporation and Chicago Dynamic Industries—though bankrupt—remained out of the defendants of the initial three lawsuits, with all other companies having settled out of court. Atari's settlement, made in June 1976, granted it a license in exchange for US$1.5 million and access granted to Magnavox to all technology produced by Atari from June 1976 to June 1977; other defendants paid higher penalties. Over the next twenty years, Sanders and Magnavox sued several other companies over the issue, focusing on "paddle-and-ball" type games like Pong and Table Tennis that more clearly violated the patent; the final lawsuits ended in the mid-1990s. Defendants included Coleco, Mattel, Seeburg, and Activision; Sanders and Magnavox won or settled every lawsuit. Many of the defendants unsuccessfully attempted to claim that the patents only applied to the specific hardware implementations that Baer had used, or that they were invalidated by prior computer or electronic games. In 1985, Nintendo sued and tried to invalidate the patents, claiming as prior art the 1958 Tennis for Two game built by William Higinbotham. The court, however, ruled that the oscilloscope-based game did not use video signals and therefore did not qualify as a video game, and ruled again in favor of Magnavox and Sanders. Magnavox won more than US$100 million in the various lawsuits and settlements involving the Odyssey related patents before they expired in the earl --20c20f3ddb3d27b4e51eda186061780f_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
 
We have been trying to reach you - Please respond!


















 
stated that the lawsuits were not filed right away because Magnavox and Sanders needed to wait until they could expect to be awarded more money than it would cost to pursue the suits. The root of the conflict was a set of patents by Baer and the development team—particularly a pair which described how the Odyssey showed player-controlled objects, or dots, on a video monitor and described a number of games that could be played with the system, with one patent by Baer and one by Rusch. The judge, John Grady, ruled in early 1977 that Baer's patent for the Odyssey constituted "the pioneering patent of the video game art", held the defendants' games as infringing, and set a precedent that any video game where a machine-controlled visual element hit and bounced off a player-controlled element violated Rusch's patent. At the time of judgement, only Seeburg Corporation and Chicago Dynamic Industries—though bankrupt—remained out of the defendants of the initial three lawsuits, with all other companies having settled out of court. Atari's settlement, made in June 1976, granted it a license in exchange for US$1.5 million and access granted to Magnavox to all technology produced by Atari from June 1976 to June 1977; other defendants paid higher penalties. Over the next twenty years, Sanders and Magnavox sued several otherompanieand settlements involving the Odyssey related patents before they expired in t




--20c20f3ddb3d27b4e51eda186061780f_16e30_60e51--