Return-path: <57162-93744-396881-13512-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.peoplewhiz.live> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:08:07 -0700 Received: from [23.247.102.82] (port=46777 helo=beer.peoplewhiz.live) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <57162-93744-396881-13512-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.peoplewhiz.live>) id 1okmKA-006OpG-LL for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:08:06 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=peoplewhiz.live; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=PeoplewhizAd@peoplewhiz.live; bh=r3zCC+2u0FFGSn/oRYhbvhIfpgU=; b=sIw+RZDR03S6Jx+yU4+4flSJ8e/AvHjzOsLsnvRL73odBjLIxrSGYji1xcjiKN03o6utYopdURK5 72JyJ34JbLUYLZTllxxZ51yZvn2Ks6GE1L/+MrRnfX0eFB3wJG+iH32k+mr3mYc9p2NTViet7b31 WH9beJ2yStSBAy06sXI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=peoplewhiz.live; b=nbCpACg4ecaBnhZXFXotWu4Ya13BeMs+Xk/ma6t1utCed9H6ODUopR9e7OGcqFM6c31Wx4vH+KYU YG6mAlxDv1F/5i6ct12vZ1rgenp6Riz7YIBBKGnQAYn935ABRsQLcfW3FMBSz8ADmmtbTk/pxJZJ q7zi8aM0GpBLt49qtZY=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2e990f3dbd191578aad87f833b59c0d1_16e30_60e51" Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:04:42 -0400 From: "USA Public Records" Reply-To: "PeopleWhiz Online Search" Subject: Is he cheating on you, [Fname]? You may be surprised… To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Is he cheating on you, [Fname]? You may be surprised… http://peoplewhiz.live/4CpxsJY8MXAEmcyvMH6lG_z7VyZKpthFUp0z76JmYdHkXPUzag http://peoplewhiz.live/tx6Cpyy3VLtvhSEPAWZeqYb7_nSjWHdHNPttyZ3TmRQ1fWDw9g Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: peoplewhiz.live] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: peoplewhiz.live] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [23.247.102.82 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [23.247.102.82 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 1.5 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 60 to 80% [score: 0.7080] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: peoplewhiz.live] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 1.5 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject: has too many raw illegal characters 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING Subject is encoded but does not specify the encoding --2e990f3dbd191578aad87f833b59c0d1_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Is he cheating on you, [Fname]? You may be surprised… http://peoplewhiz.live/4CpxsJY8MXAEmcyvMH6lG_z7VyZKpthFUp0z76JmYdHkXPUzag http://peoplewhiz.live/tx6Cpyy3VLtvhSEPAWZeqYb7_nSjWHdHNPttyZ3TmRQ1fWDw9g mapping southern Great Britain using a five-mile baseline on Hounslow Heath that Roy himself had previously measured; it crosses the present Heathrow Airport. In 1991 Royal Mail marked the bicentenary by issuing a set of postage stamps featuring maps of the Kentish village of Hamstreet. In 1801 the first one-inch-to-the-mile (1:63,360 scale) map was published, detailing the county of Kent, with Essex following shortly afterwards. The Kent map was published privately and stopped at the county border, while the Essex maps were published by Ordnance Survey and ignore the county border, setting the trend for future Ordnance Survey maps. In the next 20 years about a third of England and Wales was mapped at the same scale (see Principal Triangulation of Great Britain) under the direction of William Mudge, as other military matters took precedence. It took until 1823 to re-establish the relationship with the French survey made by Roy in 1787. By 1810 one inch to the mile maps of most of the south of England were completed, but they were withdrawn from sale between 1811 and 1816 because of security fears. By 1840 the one-inch survey had covered all of Wales and all but the six northernmost counties of England. Surveying was hard work. For instance, M --2e990f3dbd191578aad87f833b59c0d1_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter




















 
mapping southern Great Britain using a five-mile baseline on Hounslow Heath that Roy himself had previously measured; it crosses the present Heathrow Airport. In 1991 Royal Mail marked the bicentenary by issuing a set of postage stamps featuring maps of the Kentish village of Hamstreet. In 1801 the first one-inch-to-the-mile (1:63,360 scale) map was published, detailing the county of Kent, with Essex following shortly afterwards. The Kent map was published privately and stopped at the county border, while the Essex maps were published by Ordnance Survey and ignore the county border, setting the trend for future Ordnance Survey maps. In the next 20 years about a third of England and Wales was mapped at the same scale (see Principal Triangulation of Great Britain) under the direction of William Mudge, as other military matters took precedence. It took until 1823 to re-establish the relationship with the French survey made by Roy in 1787. By 1810 one inch to the mile maps of most of the south of England were completed, but they were withdrawn from sale between 1811 and 1816 because of security fears. By 1840 the one-inch survey had covered all of Wales and all but the six northernmost counties of England. Surveying was hard work. For instance, M




 
If you are unable to unsubscribe through our unsubscribe link then
kindly email us at :aboost@unsubscribe-optizmo.com



 
--2e990f3dbd191578aad87f833b59c0d1_16e30_60e51--