Return-path: <57262-93744-396881-8752-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.cvsrouter.ltd> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 02:25:49 -0700 Received: from [23.247.102.99] (port=45637 helo=moines.cvsrouter.ltd) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <57262-93744-396881-8752-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.cvsrouter.ltd>) id 1oloHg-006egl-P4 for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 02:25:48 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=cvsrouter.ltd; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=MuamaRyoko@cvsrouter.ltd; bh=dsK7WI7TMXTlCny5M7H1i0Rm5Bc=; b=DswH78bY069MDwYWyIXXqWBAXAXci4abN8GlqWVSnynOSfvDke1+Em03TjPaNHRNbQRieF7ez6CB W3dMpPt4g3DGTRF3clj3+jDHyEo5qutTupjrFAeJ7oi35LDf3TTeBQBSFO3yvzqJvYGE5vkNt5Ju +z1C8pMWbBq0QeiF1s8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=cvsrouter.ltd; b=1AG08MBC/VMHqRVPstEKdWfizLeqGn2JoW5YuOOpe3x0O0a6eMhS9d9DWYv9ncn1KCVhWNfHuEzq lad01gqFFHgiKsCcN/MycEbc7qcrjyrPSpZUnG/bXtfNhsTUCjJwW2BdpbiXI6RFxS6B8gI4Qrgq dwNw0SrkBDxVdhIbl4Q=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="cf779f2dadfa71133ee92e2c0f34e01f_16e30_60e51" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:25:40 -0400 From: "Muama Ryoko" Reply-To: "Portable WiFi" Subject: Internet.connection.anywhere.anytime.for.anyone To: Message-ID: <9j3r224ep4fp1nb4-ka9ty7dr6tu0y28n-16e30-60e51@cvsrouter.ltd> X-Spam-Score: 4.2 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.2 X-Spam_score_int: 42 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Internet.connection.anywhere.anytime.for.anyone http://cvsrouter.ltd/mP2iv5kIMOBaz-q6r4tk3xDC44nGe5xwFl5maDoLNJQcyvje http://cvsrouter.ltd/fTTwuwNZWVMqZSRimOdeM0h1DZfMz2_h0wPCC528Wrum9DaIlA Content analysis details: (4.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5001] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: cvsrouter.ltd] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [23.247.102.99 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: cvsrouter.ltd] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: cvsrouter.ltd] 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --cf779f2dadfa71133ee92e2c0f34e01f_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Internet.connection.anywhere.anytime.for.anyone http://cvsrouter.ltd/mP2iv5kIMOBaz-q6r4tk3xDC44nGe5xwFl5maDoLNJQcyvje http://cvsrouter.ltd/fTTwuwNZWVMqZSRimOdeM0h1DZfMz2_h0wPCC528Wrum9DaIlA Lucy Shanker, in a review of Hot Pink, argued that "Streets" presents Doja Cat "in her most serious form". For Lakin Starling of Pitchfork, the track fell under the "ultra-soft and chill" side of the album. Shanker hailed "Streets" as one of Hot Pink's best songs and cited how it demonstrated Doja Cat's musical versatility: "[in the previous songs, she] sounds great, but just as you settle into hearing her in that manner, she switches it up again." Starling shared a similar opinion about this versatility, but wrote that Doja Cat ran the risk of having listeners mistake her for another artist due to Hot Pink's use of several musical styles. Nonetheless, Starling praised Doja Cat's slow and raspy voice which was present in tracks like "Streets", believing that such vocal performances constituted one of the album's clearest. In an analysis of "Streets", Aaron Williams of Uproxx opined that Doja Cat's reaction to its growing popularity was an example of how to properly handle fame online. He wrote that she can adapt to her audience's interests and activities, consciously capitalizing on the Internet trends that her fans create and letting them determine which songs she should promote as new singles. Williams described this behavior as "rid the changing tides" whenever any of her old releases eventually go viral. Similarly, staff writers at Billboard believed that the track's gradual rise to fame de --cf779f2dadfa71133ee92e2c0f34e01f_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
Internet.connection.anywhere.anytime.for.anyone









Lucy Shanker, in a review of Hot Pink, argued that "Streets" presents Doja Cat "in her most serious form". For Lakin Starling of Pitchfork, the track fell under the "ultra-soft and chill" side of the album. Shanker hailed "Streets" as one of Hot Pink's best songs and cited how it demonstrated Doja Cat's musical versatility: "[in the previous songs, she] sounds great, but just as you settle into hearing her in that manner, she switches it up again." Starling shared a similar opinion about this versatility, but wrote that Doja Cat ran the risk of having listeners mistake her for another artist due to Hot Pink's use of several musical styles. Nonetheless, Starling praised Doja Cat's slow and raspy voice which was present in tracks like "Streets", believing that such vocal performances constituted one of the album's clearest. In an analysis of "Streets", Aaron Williams of Uproxx opined that Doja Cat's reaction to its growing popularity was an example of how to properly handle fame online. He wrote that she can adapt to her audience's interests and activities, consciously capitalizing on the Internet trends that her fans create and letting them determine which songs she should promote as new singles. Williams described this behavior as "rid the changing tides" whenever any of her old releases eventually go viral. Similarly, staff writers at Billboard believed that the track's gradual rise to fame de






 
If you are unable to unsubscribe through our unsubscribe link then
kindly email us at :aboost@unsubscribe-optizmo.com


 
--cf779f2dadfa71133ee92e2c0f34e01f_16e30_60e51--