Return-path: <57669-93744-396881-13805-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.reviveleaf.co> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 04:12:52 -0700 Received: from missun.minondard.com ([134.73.185.24]:49233 helo=denver.reviveleaf.co) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <57669-93744-396881-13805-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.reviveleaf.co>) id 1oqBfq-0081J7-VX for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 04:12:51 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=reviveleaf.co; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=AntiVirusNorton@reviveleaf.co; bh=2g/pWdpXEWotiVx+6/OVjWiSD8s=; b=TPSVOA0IhaKYtdqq9llU0q+VdhEJp4goVQIwngYK32XoBXjksdMMdh9qQQv+eGlgB7+0wLC6ZVuG i+XVniCnhy0JjErlF/0Y9Nn5qWhRt4w0iS4ni9oMQ0UYvgKGhAsHLT3chPpOlG0snGfl5vRBJOm+ I/24WbnDFSGHM8cUT+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=reviveleaf.co; b=CGd2tPtWMJ29orggAmVLU1Z8cpLT8MGRXT4gbom9r3qS4cYxhfWGRS6oyL3S1rwnHTqlh6Y8Xh7q K8GtxOXU/a5T8MVIXI/UYzKyo2M9rgNpE01jvEqMyBWE+JW2QQFVLN1lWiYufhGmdLc/WQZENpQD BOtG00HrnDeWJ6uzrJk=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="ca6fa729db5e853000c73cfaa348c568_16e30_60e51" Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 06:28:37 -0400 From: "Norton Total Protection" Reply-To: "Norton Total Protection" Subject: Get Norton Due to an increase in Malware and Ransomware To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.3 X-Spam_score_int: 23 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Get Norton Due to an increase in Malware and Ransomware http://reviveleaf.co/mPFPu_khYBW7uzZZgyNIFSr1HlPDi-1zWuG_0NVaw49OL3Ul http://reviveleaf.co/DfpvTBEjhzwK7ZJRnG3LJ1UEH7aRduS8pK_VugbomgLrIVmR3g Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.5 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 60 to 80% [score: 0.7474] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: reviveleaf.co] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [134.73.185.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: reviveleaf.co] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [134.73.185.24 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: reviveleaf.co] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [134.73.185.24 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) --ca6fa729db5e853000c73cfaa348c568_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Get Norton Due to an increase in Malware and Ransomware http://reviveleaf.co/mPFPu_khYBW7uzZZgyNIFSr1HlPDi-1zWuG_0NVaw49OL3Ul http://reviveleaf.co/DfpvTBEjhzwK7ZJRnG3LJ1UEH7aRduS8pK_VugbomgLrIVmR3g rinna, like Pindar, wrote choral lyric poetry – as demonstrated by her invocation of Terpsichore, the Muse of dance and chorus, in one of her fragments. According to the Suda, she wrote five books of poetry. Her works were collected in a Boeotian edition in the late third or early second century BC, and later Hellenistic and Roman texts of Corinna derived from this. This Boeotian edition was produced in a scholarly format, with titles for the poems; it may have also included accent marks and hypotheses, but is unlikely to have included line numbers. Corinna wrote in a literary dialect, which had features of her Boeotian vernacular, along with similarities to the language of epic both in morphology and in her choice of words; Daniel Berman describes it as "epic written as Boeotian". If Corinna was a contemporary of Pindar, this use of the local vernacular as a literary language is archaic – though the earlier poets Alcman and Stesichoros wrote in literary dialects based on their own vernaculars, the fifth-c --ca6fa729db5e853000c73cfaa348c568_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter


























rinna, like Pindar, wrote choral lyric poetry – as demonstrated by her invocation of Terpsichore, the Muse of dance and chorus, in one of her fragments. According to the Suda, she wrote five books of poetry. Her works were collected in a Boeotian edition in the late third or early second century BC, and later Hellenistic and Roman texts of Corinna derived from this. This Boeotian edition was produced in a scholarly format, with titles for the poems; it may have also included accent marks and hypotheses, but is unlikely to have included line numbers. Corinna wrote in a literary dialect, which had features of her Boeotian vernacular, along with similarities to the language of epic both in morphology and in her choice of words; Daniel Berman describes it as "epic written as Boeotian". If Corinna was a contemporary of Pindar, this use of the local vernacular as a literary language is archaic – though the earlier poets Alcman and Stesichoros wrote in literary dialects based on their own vernaculars, the fifth-c
--ca6fa729db5e853000c73cfaa348c568_16e30_60e51--