Return-path: <59701-93744-396881-13889-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.nailfungus-relief.rest> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:57:42 -0800 Received: from [104.148.44.156] (port=44195 helo=bend.nailfungus-relief.rest) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <59701-93744-396881-13889-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.nailfungus-relief.rest>) id 1pA8aP-00CEMl-Di for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:57:41 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=nailfungus-relief.rest; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=AttackingAmerica@nailfungus-relief.rest; bh=TdbmEVqqE2rrAA9QdPDufXzaJrA=; b=it7MODzjuEfTSYPSwjKjQOaXjxsWO8LR8BoTPyhSLJFX3XfRgTS0KM/QcIet8PL6Cw6mFcwnkYQE KKGtywrkpa0Rvsv32g9CRtwsKQkWIuY0TLAVZJuYhPtkyyMx9MDx3V/tJSKVmOBUMKr1CQW3vPsl 27DWPEJTnmGiCCuZabY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=nailfungus-relief.rest; b=BrKUCra/qcVdp4sDRguS4hLkrTCqA168k/XYfjvvnppAPW5p0grbaMBiW3gA4wUe/AvYx3VAiTjy JDtgZCHnxt0gDcDDR4+b0mOmthA9zDb+xG8SE8VXU8yPVHpcX91zJLs8MyZOkMxJ8AVVpGwV1epe biwDD1n7hR3+JzAtodc=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="09583ce6900a4e7ddec87490083bb253_16e30_60e51" Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:24:11 -0500 From: "Secret Attack" Reply-To: "Secret Attack" Subject: This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor... To: Message-ID: <4o1jzczudk8d7njq-y9khoyzvcrv6b139-16e30-60e51@nailfungus-relief.rest> X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.1 X-Spam_score_int: 41 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor... http://nailfungus-relief.rest/MRFSQHfAvPNZHW3L8zHDuSq3pRYNsTifRnOcxV1Y-bMkdIkq http://nailfungus-relief.rest/Lv9W-YmEZJ2HAaCDFgutEbe-FTDyd6oho97vFaKLOnBJD_dzzg Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5063] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: nailfungus-relief.rest] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [104.148.44.156 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [104.148.44.156 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [104.148.44.156 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: nailfungus-relief.rest] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: nailfungus-relief.rest] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 ACT_NOW_CAPS BODY: Talks about 'acting now' with capitals 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --09583ce6900a4e7ddec87490083bb253_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor... http://nailfungus-relief.rest/MRFSQHfAvPNZHW3L8zHDuSq3pRYNsTifRnOcxV1Y-bMkdIkq http://nailfungus-relief.rest/Lv9W-YmEZJ2HAaCDFgutEbe-FTDyd6oho97vFaKLOnBJD_dzzg ad previously felt the need for a naval presence they had relied on small squadrons provided by their allies. In 260 BC Romans set out to construct a fleet using a shipwrecked Carthaginian quinquereme as a blueprint for their own ships. Naval victories at Mylae and Sulci, and their frustration at the continuing stalemate in Sicily, led the Romans to focus on a sea-based strategy and to develop a plan to invade the Carthaginian heartland in North Africa and threaten their capital, Carthage (close to what is now Tunis). Both sides were determined to establish naval supremacy and invested large amounts of money and manpower in increasing and maintaining the size of their navies. The Roman fleet of 330 warships plus an unknown number of transport ships sailed from Ostia, the port of Rome, in early 256 BC, commanded by the consuls for the year, Marcus Atilius Regulus and Lucius Manlius Vulso Longus. They embarked approximately 26,000 picked legionaries from the Roman forces on Sicily. The Carthaginians were aware of the Romans' intentions and mustered all 350 available warships under Hanno[note 4] and Hamilcar, off the south coast of Sicily to intercept them. A combined total of about --09583ce6900a4e7ddec87490083bb253_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
 
Prepper.


Bolt your doors... lock your windows... and Watch This Mind-Blowing Video TODAY... mind blowing video



Because it reveals The #1 Reason CIA Director James Woolsey claims
over 228 million
Americans could be dead by election day...

And it won't be China, Russia, or ISIS pulling the trigger.

In fact, it's much closer to home....

It's already been banned in several key liberal states...

But word's spread fast...

Over 18,453,961 Americans have already seen it...

Click HERE Now to See the Full Shocking Documentary

(It only takes 3 minutes)

But Act Now - Before it's too late.







 

ad previously felt the need for a naval presence they had relied on small squadrons provided by their allies. In 260 BC Romans set out to construct a fleet using a shipwrecked Carthaginian quinquereme as a blueprint for their own ships. Naval victories at Mylae and Sulci, and their frustration at the continuing stalemate in Sicily, led the Romans to focus on a sea-based strategy and to develop a plan to invade the Carthaginian heartland in North Africa and threaten their capital, Carthage (close to what is now Tunis). Both sides were determined to establish naval supremacy and invested large amounts of money and manpower in increasing and maintaining the size of their navies. The Roman fleet of 330 warships plus an unknown number of transport ships sailed from Ostia, the port of Rome, in early 256 BC, commanded by the consuls for the year, Marcus Atilius Regulus and Lucius Manlius Vulso Longus. They embarked approximately 26,000 picked legionaries from the Roman forces on Sicily. The Carthaginians were aware of the Romans' intentions and mustered all 350 available warships under Hanno[note 4] and Hamilcar, off the south coast of Sicily to intercept them. A combined total of about



 
--09583ce6900a4e7ddec87490083bb253_16e30_60e51--