Return-path: <59901-93744-396881-13985-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.nailsin.co> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 01:10:22 -0800 Received: from [185.121.121.192] (port=55617 helo=nate.nailsin.co) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <59901-93744-396881-13985-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.nailsin.co>) id 1pCGpn-00DVA8-6Y for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 01:10:20 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=nailsin.co; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=LastMinuteGiveaway@nailsin.co; bh=baAs9dn7c46FaHf0hm4y9L5ALjw=; b=XXJiC687CdHUMwS9UtCto18MGlGzMOgaRnG0CKUH0tISquMgzkAehXo5PM3YWittSkilHIaNvNvo e9QCz3xaENEvc1u2e8cXC6s0vTrgbtQxBgCuP4uOOLNoBbU/B3MfmPlAxS60W8W+xfUDh2lfQJTm ZrUC5k/fed+YA9hdAkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=nailsin.co; b=N7vhNIUL3RLdt903sYITFfbg8tejs7+bLKyApOBsaeVmZJCX1svhN9sAjhUi3u/B4DiKfVFXrHuq sTQStaW8Oz3WnbMWMsi+ILa03y2QAQjk4UgA9uTebgEGzDUewJFS20Pdu/G1nF7ACKZlUDy2l2nd PuXBQRLF69ifrFB5xlU=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7390335b19ca6b97ecdc344e01ac9b34_16e30_60e51" Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:07:55 +0100 From: "Ace Department" Reply-To: "Consumer Rewards" Subject: Did you receive your package? To: Message-ID: <7pfsoy4s7wjtzerf-a30omdk01fufkhad-16e30-60e51@nailsin.co> X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.5 X-Spam_score_int: 35 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Did you receive your package? http://nailsin.co/wYb8DeGITaTchwOE3kPnOa3903k4iaZAVWhNZG-i0DcgyKyzVQ http://nailsin.co/cAdgcfx4xzhd1Y9oL8KxwQo0fme99PKbkg6qVMbvpGPw9YEJTw Content analysis details: (3.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95% [score: 0.9115] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: nailsin.co] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: nailsin.co] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [185.121.121.192 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 1.4 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: HTML: images with 2400-2800 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --7390335b19ca6b97ecdc344e01ac9b34_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Did you receive your package? http://nailsin.co/wYb8DeGITaTchwOE3kPnOa3903k4iaZAVWhNZG-i0DcgyKyzVQ http://nailsin.co/cAdgcfx4xzhd1Y9oL8KxwQo0fme99PKbkg6qVMbvpGPw9YEJTw hanoum controlled access to both mining in the Hindu Kush and strategically important choke points. Extensive fortifications, which were continuously maintained, upgraded, and rebuilt, surrounded the city. Ai-Khanoum, which may have initially grown in population because of royal patronage and the presence of a mint in the city, lost some importance through the secession of the Greco-Bactrians under Diodotus I (c.?250 BC). Seleucid construction programs were halted, and the city probably became primarily military in function; it may have been a conflict zone during the invasion of Antiochus III (c.?209 – c.?205 BC). Ai-Khanoum began to grow once more under Euthydemus I and his successor Demetrius I, who began to assert control over the northwest Indian subcontinent. Many of the present ruins date from the time of Eucratides I, who substantially redeveloped the city and who may have renamed it Eucratideia, after himself. Soon after his death c.?145 BC, the Greco-Bactrian kingdom collapsed—Ai-Khan --7390335b19ca6b97ecdc344e01ac9b34_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
Did you receive your package?




























hanoum controlled access to both mining in the Hindu Kush and strategically important choke points. Extensive fortifications, which were continuously maintained, upgraded, and rebuilt, surrounded the city. Ai-Khanoum, which may have initially grown in population because of royal patronage and the presence of a mint in the city, lost some importance through the secession of the Greco-Bactrians under Diodotus I (c. 250 BC). Seleucid construction programs were halted, and the city probably became primarily military in function; it may have been a conflict zone during the invasion of Antiochus III (c. 209 – c. 205 BC). Ai-Khanoum began to grow once more under Euthydemus I and his successor Demetrius I, who began to assert control over the northwest Indian subcontinent. Many of the present ruins date from the time of Eucratides I, who substantially redeveloped the city and who may have renamed it Eucratideia, after himself. Soon after his death c. 145 BC, the Greco-Bactrian kingdom collapsed—Ai-Khan

 
--7390335b19ca6b97ecdc344e01ac9b34_16e30_60e51--