Return-path: <59943-93744-396881-13990-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.walgreen.shop> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 01:18:45 -0800 Received: from [37.46.150.67] (port=60450 helo=arvada.walgreen.shop) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <59943-93744-396881-13990-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.walgreen.shop>) id 1pCdRS-00Dkai-9N for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 01:18:44 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=walgreen.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=DysonVacuum@walgreen.shop; bh=WZiKSqp4/LCwTvOTne5mj6oZhds=; b=U4shLJ6YDZLrd9SIQSilUw8EQNtQks5QBikkbV6ZX13Q8cTyKzQx6FHUCv87Z+BaLK+fhrI/Iwjc Dk6qjcRHyn15MCNXtUw+d0tO2UvQI6ort/Q5+WVy9mB0GP94j0RflsefC7LQn+S8dQfCzSBLaBXC hvRi+0rmHfNKbA78U1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=walgreen.shop; b=D07Onh2QQvccZg4Z6rQ0tCT1PaNZEAwmtR8D3+/6X3dKRqsC2wW5u1asetWH7VXa5V2VIWu41ed3 Kr3R4fLL46V+Y9uLn4lxqOo7YthG81rEzwTb63XlIHOpKa2bfALcPfgwKOvbXB69wF2pYT2Wva3V zyEuSXjb7it//84gQSY=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="d775986a135a3a11ee046ef39b251490_16e30_60e51" Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:15:39 +0100 From: "Confirmation Needed" Reply-To: "Consumer Rewards" Subject: Lucky chance to receive a FREE Dyson Vacuum To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lucky chance to receive a FREE Dyson Vacuum http://walgreen.shop/H_5bxc1BMUncoJd-mJ27_TUBwaBixvC3vpMD8e4qm-phQ07n http://walgreen.shop/XGgIkl6Znxzpt3YtPx9LfWfXcsPA_AIS12FHmSc28tpD_NV9vQ Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: walgreen.shop] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5001] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [37.46.150.67 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: walgreen.shop] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: walgreen.shop] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [37.46.150.67 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [37.46.150.67 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --d775986a135a3a11ee046ef39b251490_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lucky chance to receive a FREE Dyson Vacuum http://walgreen.shop/H_5bxc1BMUncoJd-mJ27_TUBwaBixvC3vpMD8e4qm-phQ07n http://walgreen.shop/XGgIkl6Znxzpt3YtPx9LfWfXcsPA_AIS12FHmSc28tpD_NV9vQ the Senate, the bill was referred to the Committee on Banking and Currency on March 26, 1936. Only two weeks earlier, on March 11, a subcommittee of the Banking Committee led by Colorado's Alva B. Adams had examined abuses of commemorative coin issuers. The subcommittee had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the time, when issuers often increased the number of coins needed for a complete set by having them issued at different mints with different mint marks; existing legislation placed no prohibition on this. Lyman W. Hoffecker, a Texas coin dealer and official of the American Numismatic Association, testified that some coins like the Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar, first struck in 1926, had been issued over the course of years with different dates and mint marks. Other issues had been entirely bought up by single dealers, and some low-mintage varieties of commemorative coins were selling at high prices. The many varieties and inflated prices for some issues that resulted from these practices angered coin collectors trying to keep their collections current. Adams reported the Albany bill back to the Senate on May 21, 1936, with a proposed amendment. The amendment entirely rewrote the bill, imposing restrictions such as a one-year limit for issuance of the coins from the Mint after enactment of the bill, and that they be struck at only one of the mints. The bill was considered by the Senate on June 1, and the bill was amended and passed without discussion or dissen --d775986a135a3a11ee046ef39b251490_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter




























the Senate, the bill was referred to the Committee on Banking and Currency on March 26, 1936. Only two weeks earlier, on March 11, a subcommittee of the Banking Committee led by Colorado's Alva B. Adams had examined abuses of commemorative coin issuers. The subcommittee had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the time, when issuers often increased the number of coins needed for a complete set by having them issued at different mints with different mint marks; existing legislation placed no prohibition on this. Lyman W. Hoffecker, a Texas coin dealer and official of the American Numismatic Association, testified that some coins like the Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar, first struck in 1926, had been issued over the course of years with different dates and mint marks. Other issues had been entirely bought up by single dealers, and some low-mintage varieties of commemorative coins were selling at high prices. The many varieties and inflated prices for some issues that resulted from these practices angered coin collectors trying to keep their collections current. Adams reported the Albany bill back to the Senate on May 21, 1936, with a proposed amendment. The amendment entirely rewrote the bill, imposing restrictions such as a one-year limit for issuance of the coins from the Mint after enactment of the bill, and that they be struck at only one of the mints. The bill was considered by the Senate on June 1, and the bill was amended and passed without discussion or dissen
 
--d775986a135a3a11ee046ef39b251490_16e30_60e51--