Return-path: <60548-93744-396881-13389-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.lowesurvey.rest> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:13:47 -0800 Received: from [185.121.121.54] (port=59643 helo=rock.lowesurvey.rest) by d7893716a6e6 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <60548-93744-396881-13389-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.lowesurvey.rest>) id 1pIu1N-0009jt-Pt for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:13:45 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=lowesurvey.rest; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=DeltaAirlinesShopperFeedback@lowesurvey.rest; bh=sOs14H83N1TbYf/xubMDR0GVa18=; b=VKGptNPBbw1f9jmqx99FydseyAD/cwJ9st9kvqgRGnqYc3FuVAVzBV3wg+NqVRurMXqOLYVNAroh ry9UH0jME23k5CureT0puIOmZUF1wMbgxmOc8iXclpQ4UX4PmZOndudsm+99Dxxu/h9vbnYAEcKZ yGoyiawa/qeX7nScfHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=lowesurvey.rest; b=O+Rl9O+4TZmXFp5WammEQHE4Y23yq/txuE/AtJs21dsDbVkLVlxF52kkFe2wJpB/1GgUP23tnop1 Zxpy0GQtJZA2Z9LCPUppCBnOqjv5fGZxVxF+yBmx39oFseaPMia0SfbZNGFhsYtVTgxk2pgPMExN ZPNS/U35F8/W0nsN3II=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3ba731c09ee9041bbecf0237cd3bc75d_16e30_60e51" Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:55:26 +0100 From: "Delta Airlines Shopper Feedback" Reply-To: "Delta Airlines Shopper Gift Card Chance" Subject: BONUS: $90 Delta Airline Gift Card Opportunity To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 4.0 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.0 X-Spam_score_int: 40 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "f6db9eef8881", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: BONUS: $90 Delta Airline Gift Card Opportunity http://lowesurvey.rest/5s-c7qP4OG-dgeMMnVr8O16pPQrAwK31LVTCfF_sYRSUQ-UNTQ http://lowesurvey.rest/jlEloxt1Q-AqswP3HP88ihnDO0SV19ZQwRtrDPNnCwL7bPb5 Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5455] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: lowesurvey.rest] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [185.121.121.54 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [185.121.121.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [185.121.121.54 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: lowesurvey.rest] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: lowesurvey.rest] 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --3ba731c09ee9041bbecf0237cd3bc75d_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit BONUS: $90 Delta Airline Gift Card Opportunity http://lowesurvey.rest/5s-c7qP4OG-dgeMMnVr8O16pPQrAwK31LVTCfF_sYRSUQ-UNTQ http://lowesurvey.rest/jlEloxt1Q-AqswP3HP88ihnDO0SV19ZQwRtrDPNnCwL7bPb5 A new Second Division was formed in 1892 with the absorption of the rival 12-club Football Alliance. Alliance clubs Nottingham Forest, The Wednesday (later renamed Sheffield Wednesday) and Newton Heath (later renamed Manchester United) were added to the new First Division, and Crewe Alexandra and Darwen were reallocated to the new Second, bringing the First Division total to 16 clubs. With the addition of Northwich Victoria (from The Combination), Burslem Port Vale (later renamed Port Vale, from the Midland League) and Sheffield United (from the Northern League), the Second Division started with 12 clubs, as Alliance club Birmingham St George's disbanded at that point. The bottom clubs of the lower division were subsequently required to apply for re-election to the League at the end of each season. Accrington F.C. was relegated from Division 1, but chose to resign from the Football League rather than play in the 2nd division. Bootle were dissolved because of financial problems. The Second Division increased to 15 clubs for season 1893–94. Instead of three clubs expanding the division, five were added to make the number fifteen. The additional clubs were Liverpoo --3ba731c09ee9041bbecf0237cd3bc75d_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter









A new Second Division was formed in 1892 with the absorption of the rival 12-club Football Alliance. Alliance clubs Nottingham Forest, The Wednesday (later renamed Sheffield Wednesday) and Newton Heath (later renamed Manchester United) were added to the new First Division, and Crewe Alexandra and Darwen were reallocated to the new Second, bringing the First Division total to 16 clubs. With the addition of Northwich Victoria (from The Combination), Burslem Port Vale (later renamed Port Vale, from the Midland League) and Sheffield United (from the Northern League), the Second Division started with 12 clubs, as Alliance club Birmingham St George's disbanded at that point. The bottom clubs of the lower division were subsequently required to apply for re-election to the League at the end of each season. Accrington F.C. was relegated from Division 1, but chose to resign from the Football League rather than play in the 2nd division. Bootle were dissolved because of financial problems. The Second Division increased to 15 clubs for season 1893–94. Instead of three clubs expanding the division, five were added to make the number fifteen. The additional clubs were Liverpoo









--3ba731c09ee9041bbecf0237cd3bc75d_16e30_60e51--