Return-path: <61857-93744-396881-13889-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.blackoutusax.shop> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:12:06 -0800 Received: from glath.unrhapsodic.com ([134.73.175.101]:42001 helo=core.blackoutusax.shop) by d47fd9c72805 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <61857-93744-396881-13889-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.blackoutusax.shop>) id 1pWypt-00043I-FF for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:12:05 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=blackoutusax.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=ShockingDocumentary@blackoutusax.shop; bh=WkByP8dFH4571/9ep2YAbCViSJs=; b=tuk2HWWhUDdx1bUjeaX5Ts8WqZo8LcVJQLzXuWRO4TaVHEnDJL+REJtGPpn331pchcIx800JfUki kZpGTqCqD285Rmuqtln8xkYsqviDVMV1GSqG1ghTtbT+3qlewmbxD4OoYGIGefRfMGqwQITaaMEa 0Vtlj2g7ZLbq7vfXqxw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=blackoutusax.shop; b=dzpTCevwu2jLK84t8pSzDSEGXJ/HSLwunUKvh2Ajqb8mweeYIUsd9FVaLaxgK9lmI2yVVG5z99j+ 4TIvWm+KQfJKn8emIWpOiYi5WM9SoN1jd18Se3Q2V8a8ZiS7ESGwSpGz2MLRdiOpOmFHSqAcd39x ZnMtgBiCWcb4gNFhuAM=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="75ff2a7a41d9872b7261a7ea49b613a2_16e30_60e51" Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:35:16 +0100 From: "Secret Attack" Reply-To: "Shocking Documentary" Subject: This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor... To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.2 X-Spam_score_int: 22 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "4dc6897cb424", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor... http://blackoutusax.shop/Qo0rtO4gtd64J4gM82SUzyIRoIgqe_ufSHbyu84qGZXJ_v4QUA http://blackoutusax.shop/Uo4QwZ0u2rWKZtIc-J2_jySRIWw-36S6Wy04ewz2L6LZPNyJKg Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: blackoutusax.shop] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: blackoutusax.shop] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [134.73.175.101 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: blackoutusax.shop] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [134.73.175.101 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 ACT_NOW_CAPS BODY: Talks about 'acting now' with capitals -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [134.73.175.101 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] --75ff2a7a41d9872b7261a7ea49b613a2_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor... http://blackoutusax.shop/Qo0rtO4gtd64J4gM82SUzyIRoIgqe_ufSHbyu84qGZXJ_v4QUA http://blackoutusax.shop/Uo4QwZ0u2rWKZtIc-J2_jySRIWw-36S6Wy04ewz2L6LZPNyJKg On 31 January 1919 she was decommissioned for the final time, and two months later she was renamed Coast Battleship Number 1 so that the name Indiana could be assigned to the newly authorized—but never completed—battleship Indiana (BB-50). The old battleship was brought to shallow waters in the Chesapeake Bay near the wreck of the target ship San Marcos (ex-Battleship Texas). Here she was subjected to aerial bombing tests conducted by the navy. She was hit with dummy bombs from aircraft, and explosive charges were set off at the positions where the bombs hit. The tests were a response to claims from Billy Mitchell—at the time assistant to Chief of Air Service Charles T. Menoher—who stated to Congress that the Air Service could sink any battleship. The conclusions drawn by the navy from the experiments conducted on Indiana were very different, as Captain William D. Leahy stated in his report: "The entire experiment pointed to the improbability of a modern battleship being either destroyed or completely put out of action by aerial bombs." The subject remained a matter of dispute between Mitchell and the Navy, and several more bombing tests were conducted with other decommissioned battleships, culminating in the sinking of SMS Ostfriesland. Indiana sank during the test and settled in the shallow water, where she remained until her wreck was sold for scrap on 19 March 1924. When the US Navy adopted hull numbers in 1920, Indiana was retroactively assigned the number "BB --75ff2a7a41d9872b7261a7ea49b613a2_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
 
Prepper.


Bolt your doors... lock your windows... and Watch This Mind-Blowing Video TODAY... mind blowing video



Because it reveals The #1 Reason CIA Director James Woolsey claims
over 228 million
Americans could be dead by election day...

And it won't be China, Russia, or ISIS pulling the trigger.

In fact, it's much closer to home....

It's already been banned in several key liberal states...

But word's spread fast...

Over 18,453,961 Americans have already seen it...

Click HERE Now to See the Full Shocking Documentary

(It only takes 3 minutes)

But Act Now - Before it's too late.






 

On 31 January 1919 she was decommissioned for the final time, and two months later she was renamed Coast Battleship Number 1 so that the name Indiana could be assigned to the newly authorized—but never completed—battleship Indiana (BB-50). The old battleship was brought to shallow waters in the Chesapeake Bay near the wreck of the target ship San Marcos (ex-Battleship Texas). Here she was subjected to aerial bombing tests conducted by the navy. She was hit with dummy bombs from aircraft, and explosive charges were set off at the positions where the bombs hit. The tests were a response to claims from Billy Mitchell—at the time assistant to Chief of Air Service Charles T. Menoher—who stated to Congress that the Air Service could sink any battleship. The conclusions drawn by the navy from the experiments conducted on Indiana were very different, as Captain William D. Leahy stated in his report: "The entire experiment pointed to the improbability of a modern battleship being either destroyed or completely put out of action by aerial bombs." The subject remained a matter of dispute between Mitchell and the Navy, and several more bombing tests were conducted with other decommissioned battleships, culminating in the sinking of SMS Ostfriesland. Indiana sank during the test and settled in the shallow water, where she remained until her wreck was sold for scrap on 19 March 1924. When the US Navy adopted hull numbers in 1920, Indiana was retroactively assigned the number "BB


--75ff2a7a41d9872b7261a7ea49b613a2_16e30_60e51--