Return-path: <61982-93744-396881-13794-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.huuskhandmadeknives.rest> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Sat, 04 Mar 2023 03:13:34 -0800 Received: from smarth.johnato.com ([134.73.175.67]:60085 helo=long.huuskhandmadeknives.rest) by d47fd9c72805 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <61982-93744-396881-13794-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.huuskhandmadeknives.rest>) id 1pYPpQ-000JY7-Hc for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2023 03:13:33 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=huuskhandmadeknives.rest; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=OnlinePromotions@huuskhandmadeknives.rest; bh=cIHVonoon5DXjY40PoxMifF64go=; b=a5drXRmjcGS+sw/I4ghmcYM20LvN1rDFe5/vzBzqodXlm1KuuFb6c9WwzxvH8lZcJZbjuy9nT4ZX bNE8ueuCF+kWHiElqB24JFhuPiqwRp2mDLsRbfZu8xXmuyEESJRAHluqVdj1G+ad0X7CAHHPjQhs Q8lx94rV9++EpE68ljM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=huuskhandmadeknives.rest; b=eBxNi9/224TxyyqOTvITRmul/PqmQEZQ6EKsu+BIyOAY8gmxZUAvQF6Keh6yUgyyKBoL3ySuq4IV Nz7ylKvVpnRjJY+xCA7ei4wYOwrA7x4TXna5/SKbTcqSlQLwpNGgY08+5IAbObx4UDI+2EmS86pS jieZUD560D6sezcy/70=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b9d7131e29a4b2a867d10ee90514f97c_16e30_60e51" Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 12:12:57 +0100 From: "Online Promotions" Reply-To: "Customer Survey" Subject: Shopper, You can qualify to get a $100 UPS gift card! To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.1 X-Spam_score_int: 41 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "4dc6897cb424", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Shopper, You can qualify to get a $100 UPS gift card! http://huuskhandmadeknives.rest/IjX6CpqBJxghOh3BK1m-gkhBZRPvqa1a6_2gcILsa9Y8xcIeSg http://huuskhandmadeknives.rest/OvJaBnzSs8OZ5mtAXBom4qJvV27jntAnpfKcIKlnyc0ALZO4CQ Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: huuskhandmadeknives.rest] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: huuskhandmadeknives.rest] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [134.73.175.67 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: huuskhandmadeknives.rest] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [134.73.175.67 listed in psbl.surriel.com] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [134.73.175.67 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] --b9d7131e29a4b2a867d10ee90514f97c_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Shopper, You can qualify to get a $100 UPS gift card! http://huuskhandmadeknives.rest/IjX6CpqBJxghOh3BK1m-gkhBZRPvqa1a6_2gcILsa9Y8xcIeSg http://huuskhandmadeknives.rest/OvJaBnzSs8OZ5mtAXBom4qJvV27jntAnpfKcIKlnyc0ALZO4CQ he hooded pitohui (Pitohui dichrous) was described by the French ornithologist Charles Lucien Bonaparte in 1850. Bonaparte placed it in the genus Rectes which had been erected in the same year by Ludwig Reichenbach as an alternative name for the genus Pitohui, which had been described by René Lesson in 1831. No explanation was given for the preference of the newer name over the established older one, but it was common to prefer Latin names over non-Latin names, and to provide Latin names to those without. Richard Bowdler Sharpe encapsulated that attitude when he wrote in 1903 "Pitohui is doubtless an older name than Rectes, but can surely be laid aside as a barbarous word". Eventually however the principle of priority, which favours the first formal name given to a taxon, was applied, and Rectes was suppressed as the junior synonym of Pitohui. The hooded pitohui was placed in the genus Pitohui with five other species, and the genus was thought to reside within the Australasian whistler family (Pachycephalidae). A 2008 examination of the genus, however, found it to be polyphyletic (meaning that the genus contained unrelated species), with some purported members of the genus not actually falling within the whistlers. The hooded pitohui and the closely related variable pitohui were both found to be related to the Old World orioles (Oriolidae). A 2010 study by the same team confirmed that the hooded pitohui and variable pitohui were orioles and indeed were sister species, and that together with the --b9d7131e29a4b2a867d10ee90514f97c_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
 











he hooded pitohui (Pitohui dichrous) was described by the French ornithologist Charles Lucien Bonaparte in 1850. Bonaparte placed it in the genus Rectes which had been erected in the same year by Ludwig Reichenbach as an alternative name for the genus Pitohui, which had been described by René Lesson in 1831. No explanation was given for the preference of the newer name over the established older one, but it was common to prefer Latin names over non-Latin names, and to provide Latin names to those without. Richard Bowdler Sharpe encapsulated that attitude when he wrote in 1903 "Pitohui is doubtless an older name than Rectes, but can surely be laid aside as a barbarous word". Eventually however the principle of priority, which favours the first formal name given to a taxon, was applied, and Rectes was suppressed as the junior synonym of Pitohui. The hooded pitohui was placed in the genus Pitohui with five other species, and the genus was thought to reside within the Australasian whistler family (Pachycephalidae). A 2008 examination of the genus, however, found it to be polyphyletic (meaning that the genus contained unrelated species), with some purported members of the genus not actually falling within the whistlers. The hooded pitohui and the closely related variable pitohui were both found to be related to the Old World orioles (Oriolidae). A 2010 study by the same team confirmed that the hooded pitohui and variable pitohui were orioles and indeed were sister species, and that together














 
--b9d7131e29a4b2a867d10ee90514f97c_16e30_60e51--