Return-path: <62199-93744-396881-13753-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.ukrainbridesforyou.shop> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 20:26:55 -0800 Received: from wcbm.unrhapsodic.com ([134.73.175.106]:57984 helo=apples.ukrainbridesforyou.shop) by 8612a944938c with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <62199-93744-396881-13753-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.ukrainbridesforyou.shop>) id 1pbDII-000IMr-Td for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 20:26:54 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=ukrainbridesforyou.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=Congrats@ukrainbridesforyou.shop; bh=di35da/4IlDyoswt4YEfNNqlhp8=; b=N+7/liYKt9S7dZteYit0no21hEXsjRFR+jhT7TFNCwqfo4WHqgbCTCRM1LKwk9slzlpWdP2/CAp+ 6HG2N3SGi1ySnnhPCoU7eOcLCeUGSeYVA1fajfjZC2p7DxWPiM+nQbScGo6cxuc3NbgIMHWO5sLY MGAmfGOJ7NZ9vRXaMLg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=ukrainbridesforyou.shop; b=TVqCjslasiCLA4ZF2JYxe/Q4ZGQgMZALDw3/DfTdOWX2vbAWkAsYHJQU2HUkdKu0Xy51RkDUPSuQ W5hRgEg3vJREmu8GHLDYU/udBmg+8P9lMYD5OFjYku8ZcaVVBFEGXibDbud/fglCrvN1pLaIlaB+ eQ754qSGhFzPSPDsSxk=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15105639d097750735a96a12368975e2_16e30_60e51" Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 05:11:39 +0100 From: "Good News" Reply-To: "Red Lobster Opinion Requested" Subject: Leave your feedback and you could WIN! To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.7 X-Spam_score_int: 17 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "e87f7907b374", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Leave your feedback and you could WIN! http://ukrainbridesforyou.shop/WjjE5IXFZKXQlZIDn2OMtoewCTF5Ih31pmmhPj2mi7Q5VkYMJA http://ukrainbridesforyou.shop/xSdbQAe4jjTek6dEa8Don0umzWFODeqez6VFIyB4zATeSBPjfQ Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ukrainbridesforyou.shop] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: ukrainbridesforyou.shop] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [134.73.175.106 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [134.73.175.106 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: ukrainbridesforyou.shop] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [134.73.175.106 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] --15105639d097750735a96a12368975e2_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Leave your feedback and you could WIN! http://ukrainbridesforyou.shop/WjjE5IXFZKXQlZIDn2OMtoewCTF5Ih31pmmhPj2mi7Q5VkYMJA http://ukrainbridesforyou.shop/xSdbQAe4jjTek6dEa8Don0umzWFODeqez6VFIyB4zATeSBPjfQ while two others, "10A" and "10B" featured the larger guns; the submissions from Kiel have not survived and their details are not known. Wilhelm interrupted this design work by suggesting that speed should be increased significantly at the price of reducing the main battery to 24 cm guns, which resulted in further design studies that were completed by April. All of these were deemed unacceptable and further design work was carried out within the Reichsmarineamt (Imperial Naval Office). The officers there observed that the secondary battery should be limited to 21 cm guns, since the increased weight of the 24 cm weapons limited the number of guns. This resulted in "Project I", armed with twelve of the guns, "Project II", armed with sixteen of the guns, and "Project III", which carried eight 24 cm guns. All three variants kept a 28 cm main battery. During deliberations in late April, "Project I" emerged as the favored design since it would be cheaper than "II" (which would also require widening of the Kaiser Wilhelm Canal). The design was refined into two versions, "IA" and "IB", with the former using casemates and the latter using single turrets. Wilhelm approved "IA" in May, although the arrangement of the secondary guns proved to be contentious, and in December another variant, "7D", which moved eight of the guns to twin turrets and adopted an improved underwater protection system was submitted, which the Kaiser approved on 7 January 1904. These plans were disrupted immediately when the Germans learn --15105639d097750735a96a12368975e2_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter

Leave your feedback and you could WIN!














while two others, "10A" and "10B" featured the larger guns; the submissions from Kiel have not survived and their details are not known. Wilhelm interrupted this design work by suggesting that speed should be increased significantly at the price of reducing the main battery to 24 cm guns, which resulted in further design studies that were completed by April. All of these were deemed unacceptable and further design work was carried out within the Reichsmarineamt (Imperial Naval Office). The officers there observed that the secondary battery should be limited to 21 cm guns, since the increased weight of the 24 cm weapons limited the number of guns. This resulted in "Project I", armed with twelve of the guns, "Project II", armed with sixteen of the guns, and "Project III", which carried eight 24 cm guns. All three variants kept a 28 cm main battery. During deliberations in late April, "Project I" emerged as the favored design since it would be cheaper than "II" (which would also require widening of the Kaiser Wilhelm Canal). The design was refined into two versions, "IA" and "IB", with the former using casemates and the latter using single turrets. Wilhelm approved "IA" in May, although the arrangement of the secondary guns proved to be contentious, and in December another variant, "7D", which moved eight of the guns to twin turrets and adopted an improved underwater protection system was submitted, which the Kaiser approved on 7 January 1904. These plans were disrupted immediately when the Germans learn


 
--15105639d097750735a96a12368975e2_16e30_60e51--