Return-path: <63387-93744-396881-14377-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.lowesurvey.shop> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:35:07 -0700 Received: from [157.52.237.137] (port=38776 helo=grid.lowesurvey.shop) by d58c2cd1180d with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <63387-93744-396881-14377-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.lowesurvey.shop>) id 1poLGK-002w1h-Vj for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:35:06 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=lowesurvey.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=CovidTesting@lowesurvey.shop; bh=pI/F6hw+u4wMPCwsMEoo2a7Eca8=; b=qSPY1brOUAqWa9gHIA2Tf6DXTR1pGlx+NXFgZU9oojdeJ71yHJoNKQpA4rSX12Z7UxMYFygfYhWo iLSFWPVupRHMJRVuB9y2UT/BIHVilCwQBqUMt45BtFHuXZm2tQ46CabUwgklPXr4FRDqCba4M+zd tT2rhWv107jqXCa7wYI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=lowesurvey.shop; b=Jg86fKwdwS+k3tNkqqi8EGOEX9vWBHSRjvtEVlVc+Hvv/K05995ieYgyWyy/CUrH0WQh6GUXfJbl oPKLokt1x8UEJe1iPlbQ1aiZZvL2f0vumXl7hRJRffR0v+4pWqTgVye/rhKNLj1BlHlnI/2NAMIx zpRjeqWeOMVwx0i04Kk=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="51f80e2e87eeae207307c523a8bda7a7_16e30_60e51" Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 10:38:23 +0200 From: "Free Covid Test Program" Reply-To: "Health Emergency Update" Subject: Covid Tests delivered at no cost to you To: Message-ID: <3kc5tedlt54bzbse-bpfxmusxzwb7lhls-16e30-60e51@lowesurvey.shop> X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.9 X-Spam_score_int: 49 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "50bab00d4276", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Covid Tests delivered at no cost to you http://lowesurvey.shop/DvVnGigBQatbWi7weYCZIr0B30orinoZmg7_gn_cRircaZkdlg http://lowesurvey.shop/7laPBJjN3lmvsoTktynsAwglCF-t_Yc6L3i5FK6AxUjUBB898Q Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lowesurvey.shop] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [157.52.237.137 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: lowesurvey.shop] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [157.52.237.137 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --51f80e2e87eeae207307c523a8bda7a7_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Covid Tests delivered at no cost to you http://lowesurvey.shop/DvVnGigBQatbWi7weYCZIr0B30orinoZmg7_gn_cRircaZkdlg http://lowesurvey.shop/7laPBJjN3lmvsoTktynsAwglCF-t_Yc6L3i5FK6AxUjUBB898Q A bill to authorize a Roanoke half dollar was introduced into the United States House of Representatives on May 20, 1936 by Lindsay C. Warren of North Carolina, a Democrat. Rather than being referred to the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures, it was sent to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for floor consideration. Warren asked unanimous consent to proceed with the bill. Bertrand H. Snell of New York, a Republican, stated that if the House had many more of these bills, he would make a speech in favor of each one of them (presumably to delay them), but as he had been overruled so many times on them, he would not object. Robert F. Rich of Pennsylvania, a Republican, stated that this was the 35th coinage bill that the Democratic majority had brought forward, possibly as a way to inflate the currency, and that they should be careful not to do something they might regret. Neither representative objected, and the bill passed the House without recorded dissent. The bill then passed to the Senate, and on May 21, 1936, was referred to its Committee on Banking and Currency. The bill emerged from that committee on June 2, 1936, with a report by Democratic Senator Alva Adams of Colorado. Senator Adams had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the mid-1930s, with low mintages effectively unavailable to the collector, or issuers increasing the number of coins needed for a complete set by having them issued at different mints with different mint marks; and had held hearings on this on March 11, 1936. Adams' committee report noted that the original bill contained "the standardized amendmen --51f80e2e87eeae207307c523a8bda7a7_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter

Covid Tests delivered at no cost to you










A bill to authorize a Roanoke half dollar was introduced into the United States House of Representatives on May 20, 1936 by Lindsay C. Warren of North Carolina, a Democrat. Rather than being referred to the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures, it was sent to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for floor consideration. Warren asked unanimous consent to proceed with the bill. Bertrand H. Snell of New York, a Republican, stated that if the House had many more of these bills, he would make a speech in favor of each one of them (presumably to delay them), but as he had been overruled so many times on them, he would not object. Robert F. Rich of Pennsylvania, a Republican, stated that this was the 35th coinage bill that the Democratic majority had brought forward, possibly as a way to inflate the currency, and that they should be careful not to do something they might regret. Neither representative objected, and the bill passed the House without recorded dissent. The bill then passed to the Senate, and on May 21, 1936, was referred to its Committee on Banking and Currency. The bill emerged from that committee on June 2, 1936, with a report by Democratic Senator Alva Adams of Colorado. Senator Adams had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the mid-1930s, with low mintages effectively unavailable to the collector, or issuers increasing the number of coins needed for a complete set by having them issued at different mints with different mint marks; and had held hearings on this on March 11, 1936. Adams' committee report noted that the original bill contained "the standardized amendmen







--51f80e2e87eeae207307c523a8bda7a7_16e30_60e51--