Return-path: <63641-93744-396881-14377-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.nervecontroll.shop> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 07:52:30 -0700 Received: from [157.52.237.178] (port=44613 helo=oaks.nervecontroll.shop) by d58c2cd1180d with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <63641-93744-396881-14377-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.nervecontroll.shop>) id 1pqb4Y-003ZsN-VF for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 07:52:28 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=nervecontroll.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=CovidTesting@nervecontroll.shop; bh=EOJmMiHH6aaCECbnygNDpmSikrM=; b=Wdz0N8YIEaKoWJcINh1rJNJEmKP5wp53Y6dl2wnSp6kxbUe/hqve7npdkjR6tx34ZMaMf2MyuEne uA6a3DYbVl/FSJHyv3qF86TyyFpz7sc30NmLD45k0o37kSOGFk25plGlu+qdKpAHySwDwOyC1DU+ GQzKFS4g7rARDmyUqq0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=nervecontroll.shop; b=DTJifwvThH6eIizit3v3fqY+nsDyowG8GPi28JK0PJ+4K0qgnaCXFCYDiMSMs5PlfM/qXbrtXefn V3wkNdapeDCSw0+VocEq6ble7TQHdtDfBJKjBv71iTQHEEJEVucSlpaMKBbD3CRnuNtLTVcDUd1r Pd8wvF59YBGsu1/yYjw=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7ed6acc4b967750d058b7fa3c6082086_16e30_60e51" Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 16:34:32 +0200 From: "Go-Med-Now" Reply-To: "Health Alerts" Subject: Free Covid Tests now available, No Paperwork or Shipping Fees To: Message-ID: <85xo1fgvvsdnyoff-9sltt4xc92tx6lty-16e30-60e51@nervecontroll.shop> X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.7 X-Spam_score_int: 47 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "50bab00d4276", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Free Covid Tests now available, No Paperwork or Shipping Fees http://nervecontroll.shop/3zxCZkH8dmwR-tABmE00krjmT3oxtw9-rwqUwfTd-60mpFNPbg http://nervecontroll.shop/P2oKhDCFSdKAY6UI7hUzsC-YrVCoqA4I7YQ7CpfxU96_P7u1ZQ Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: nervecontroll.shop] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [157.52.237.178 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: nervecontroll.shop] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: nervecontroll.shop] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: nervecontroll.shop] 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --7ed6acc4b967750d058b7fa3c6082086_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Free Covid Tests now available, No Paperwork or Shipping Fees http://nervecontroll.shop/3zxCZkH8dmwR-tABmE00krjmT3oxtw9-rwqUwfTd-60mpFNPbg http://nervecontroll.shop/P2oKhDCFSdKAY6UI7hUzsC-YrVCoqA4I7YQ7CpfxU96_P7u1ZQ A bill to authorize a Roanoke half dollar was introduced into the United States House of Representatives on May 20, 1936 by Lindsay C. Warren of North Carolina, a Democrat. Rather than being referred to the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures, it was sent to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for floor consideration. Warren asked unanimous consent to proceed with the bill. Bertrand H. Snell of New York, a Republican, stated that if the House had many more of these bills, he would make a speech in favor of each one of them (presumably to delay them), but as he had been overruled so many times on them, he would not object. Robert F. Rich of Pennsylvania, a Republican, stated that this was the 35th coinage bill that the Democratic majority had brought forward, possibly as a way to inflate the currency, and that they should be careful not to do something they might regret. Neither representative objected, and the bill passed the House without recorded dissent. The bill then passed to the Senate, and on May 21, 1936, was referred to its Committee on Banking and Currency. The bill emerged from that committee on June 2, 1936, with a report by Democratic Senator Alva Adams of Colorado. Senator Adams had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the mid-1930s, with low mintages effectively unavailable to the collector, or issuers increasing the number of coins needed for a complete set by having them issued at different mints with different mint marks; and had held hearings on this on March 11, 1936. Adams' committee report noted that the original bill contained "the standardized amendmen --7ed6acc4b967750d058b7fa3c6082086_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter

Free Covid Tests now available, No Paperwork or Shipping Fees










A bill to authorize a Roanoke half dollar was introduced into the United States House of Representatives on May 20, 1936 by Lindsay C. Warren of North Carolina, a Democrat. Rather than being referred to the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures, it was sent to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for floor consideration. Warren asked unanimous consent to proceed with the bill. Bertrand H. Snell of New York, a Republican, stated that if the House had many more of these bills, he would make a speech in favor of each one of them (presumably to delay them), but as he had been overruled so many times on them, he would not object. Robert F. Rich of Pennsylvania, a Republican, stated that this was the 35th coinage bill that the Democratic majority had brought forward, possibly as a way to inflate the currency, and that they should be careful not to do something they might regret. Neither representative objected, and the bill passed the House without recorded dissent. The bill then passed to the Senate, and on May 21, 1936, was referred to its Committee on Banking and Currency. The bill emerged from that committee on June 2, 1936, with a report by Democratic Senator Alva Adams of Colorado. Senator Adams had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the mid-1930s, with low mintages effectively unavailable to the collector, or issuers increasing the number of coins needed for a complete set by having them issued at different mints with different mint marks; and had held hearings on this on March 11, 1936. Adams' committee report noted that the original bill contained "the standardized amendmen







--7ed6acc4b967750d058b7fa3c6082086_16e30_60e51--