Return-path: <63738-93744-396881-14390-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.bestdealever.today> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 01:10:16 -0700 Received: from [198.23.173.39] (port=47370 helo=yankee.bestdealever.today) by d58c2cd1180d with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <63738-93744-396881-14390-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.bestdealever.today>) id 1praE6-003pJI-My for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 01:10:14 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=bestdealever.today; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=YoureInvited@bestdealever.today; bh=47P2Hqq6YyayFwlRHZFBFXcrEMI=; b=L3Ap3eOyN8qnTQ+hrHOCHvRHJwQ8KyWQDYZbYCNLWnB9673CA5/51YUBxcc6Ye1A72zan5Sf5BQA w/zkRfgTlLb/BV1vEy9SqJe5ccu0Yd4qU/kvbXf3zA9Rri91aTFcXv20bfPHtqJ7JgK3D/eNblWZ WhXsb9m9eXgbrin1Sec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=bestdealever.today; b=psnRd/uEHWPRLaGmC1kbqPLblTiQgPE3NEj+Tp64ap8/DVXjz1+xLj7xDOL3g7cQ5xBCOoxuXMCL dwZkFSqHXK7J6mHl6N3BSHPRoC7RALdKci9tu1k23fXzCkMdSQnwyWldRW/YmEj2LxtxWRVCKIjA jchtLsQiCPlpzXjW3FU=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="45a03cd35bcadc710fefa78d5e111fa5_16e30_60e51" Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:02:02 +0200 From: "Amazing Deals" Reply-To: "You're Invited" Subject: Did you forget? Your $100 Lowe's reward Is Waiting To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Spam_score: 3.4 X-Spam_score_int: 34 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "50bab00d4276", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Did you forget? Your $100 Lowe's reward Is Waiting http://bestdealever.today/a_UDQEZHYXfTaIvgvU36Sl3_VYXzwZZq9l-5gNJelGrnsAorsA http://bestdealever.today/5z0C3i9A1UhpSfU04I4W1pxKGiRNbZ5JFvb6KVRNpUz_l6QaxA Content analysis details: (3.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: bestdealever.today] 0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: bestdealever.today] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.23.173.39 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [198.23.173.39 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [198.23.173.39 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: bestdealever.today] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --45a03cd35bcadc710fefa78d5e111fa5_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Did you forget? Your $100 Lowe's reward Is Waiting http://bestdealever.today/a_UDQEZHYXfTaIvgvU36Sl3_VYXzwZZq9l-5gNJelGrnsAorsA http://bestdealever.today/5z0C3i9A1UhpSfU04I4W1pxKGiRNbZ5JFvb6KVRNpUz_l6QaxA When Megan Went Away received no coverage from major book review magazines upon its release but was reviewed in several niche publications. Lenore Gordon praised the story in the Interracial Books for Children Bulletin in 1980, writing that its strength lies "both in gentle storytelling voice and her use of detail". Carrie Dearborn wrote in Gay Community News that the book had an emotional impact on her and her friends. She described the work as "one that will help the child of a lesbian feel less alone", praising the decorations in Schook's art as "Early American Dyke". Gordon described Schook's illustrations as having "a pleasurable child-quality" to them, which she found to be tonally inconsistent with Severance's somber text. Carolyn Moskovitz described the story in the WLW Journal as "a bit downbeat". Writing in 1989, the English professor Virginia L. Wolf suggested that the romantic nature of the relationship between Shannon's mother and Megan might not be recognized by child readers, but that some adult readers would likely understand the story's lesbian context. In 2022, the English scholar Jennifer Miller described the work as resistant to normative readings that might be belied by its simple cover art of a mother soothing her daughter, the text "showing an emotionally complex mother-child relationship that includes various instances in which the child attempts to nurture the mother". While praising its attempts to depict an anti-sexist family, Gordon criticized When Megan Went Away for presenting "an uncommonly liberated lesbian lifestyle", which she viewed as minimizing the relevance of the book to a wider array of readers. Although the depiction of a same-sex parented household satisfied some readers, others were concerned that the first story published about the topic revolved around a broken relationship. According to the early childhood education scholar Danné E. Davis, the timing of the book's publication received criticism from some contemporary lesbians and feminists, who viewed the separation narrative of When Megan Went Away as detrimental to public perception of lesbian households at a time when lesbian motherhood was beginning to increase. When writing the story, Severance was intent on depicting shared concerns like parental separation among lesbian and nonlesbian familie --45a03cd35bcadc710fefa78d5e111fa5_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter

Did you forget? Your $100 Lowe's reward Is Waiting











When Megan Went Away received no coverage from major book review magazines upon its release but was reviewed in several niche publications. Lenore Gordon praised the story in the Interracial Books for Children Bulletin in 1980, writing that its strength lies "both in gentle storytelling voice and her use of detail". Carrie Dearborn wrote in Gay Community News that the book had an emotional impact on her and her friends. She described the work as "one that will help the child of a lesbian feel less alone", praising the decorations in Schook's art as "Early American Dyke". Gordon described Schook's illustrations as having "a pleasurable child-quality" to them, which she found to be tonally inconsistent with Severance's somber text. Carolyn Moskovitz described the story in the WLW Journal as "a bit downbeat". Writing in 1989, the English professor Virginia L. Wolf suggested that the romantic nature of the relationship between Shannon's mother and Megan might not be recognized by child readers, but that some adult readers would likely understand the story's lesbian context. In 2022, the English scholar Jennifer Miller described the work as resistant to normative readings that might be belied by its simple cover art of a mother soothing her daughter, the text "showing an emotionally complex mother-child relationship that includes various instances in which the child attempts to nurture the mother". While praising its attempts to depict an anti-sexist family, Gordon criticized When Megan Went Away for presenting "an uncommonly liberated lesbian lifestyle", which she viewed as minimizing the relevance of the book to a wider array of readers. Although the depiction of a same-sex parented household satisfied some readers, others were concerned that the first story published about the topic revolved around a broken relationship. According to the early childhood education scholar Danné E. Davis, the timing of the book's publication received criticism from some contemporary lesbians and feminists, who viewed the separation narrative of When Megan Went Away as detrimental to public perception of lesbian households at a time when lesbian motherhood was beginning to increase. When writing the story, Severance was intent on depicting shared concerns like parental separation among lesbian and nonlesbian familie













 
--45a03cd35bcadc710fefa78d5e111fa5_16e30_60e51--