Return-path: <1541-515-533460-315-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.car-fixd.social> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:36:04 -0800 Received: from [194.5.97.135] (port=33590 helo=corpus.car-fixd.social) by 64c5cd764d82 with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <1541-515-533460-315-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.car-fixd.social>) id 1rfbtZ-000Xse-2T for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:36:03 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=car-fixd.social; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=support@car-fixd.social; bh=qsZ36m+x/QK4CXEXTn6ixh9/KgM=; b=Etl/IStuzpPFvYs9GjzOGO7OoQJXkqcL+x21jV5g5qsugP4Xs088h/D5xGsjE1KERzbV9/sA4BPW AdVZ87jJKUG20AGECCA0wmvLenOUHCrIAOSAlkwVkZuoOLT1QkUKvSB+luyVyagqGtMucbZ3dNFL E/DpS2XPCxQkyCdPTcHPdxRlpx04kSrVmLNQrI0y+ehGS5N6s5VWhHkIVF4PLeCteqNcFPRBa9Ap r2OlWZLlbb35zQ0Pyfn3fgGyab57BKhSM/JyPx+D3CeFKDgM/cPXk4Lk82Jvr8hlmAayhMn2/eWa xVPqyjUfe5McCDEZpvcQlkioIVYVdg66//W+pg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=car-fixd.social; b=bAsx9nYgrm91P+2F6F1JN1OWGXgcSHJZeoCll7ZoKeevCZg7L+J99EK44xMhl3GD21ee4cHxb4PC Fw8NJl67a1cFr1qsp2cpsZgzUrGqUrHQF7CiHqs4fMgSXfC1m9R629/bxEG2JQzEOc3MtW+3am5c GR/d9hKiAK237XNN7GnpDrUyzaI0Rr5A0LX1jbRrTBxVNGxCmuNC6gPDFxwepzH3OiswlGbK8mT2 nI9N/uIJt41N1ZvO6ZliOug3oID+H5YAUcLq3dUk0Wh1aKdQffRByGDgYREAfJrJwsKyDHSSsRxa V5543Afv00gyis9L7spVIFv0QKDjcmxc3pbg2g==; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6087639f51cf9b82d0072c9b090a92cc" Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:07:22 +0000 From: "Hero Privacy Pen" Reply-To: "Hero Privacy Pen" Subject: THINK THAT SIMPLY TELLING YOUR DAUGHTER TO "BE CAREFUL" To: Message-ID: <92rpn1hff0htbi4g-iti6ajtxl8a13el5-823d4@car-fixd.social> X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.7 X-Spam_score_int: 47 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "50bab00d4276", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Document You might not see them. And that’s the point. But sneaky hi-tech predators are getting more sophisticated when it comes to stealing your privacy and tracking your whereabouts. They might be recordin [...] Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: car-fixd.social] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: car-fixd.social] -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [194.5.97.135 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [194.5.97.135 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.0 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an open resolver. See https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ [URIs: car-fixd.social] 0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.1 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME 0.8 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS --6087639f51cf9b82d0072c9b090a92cc Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --6087639f51cf9b82d0072c9b090a92cc Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Document

Discreet: Small and travel friendly

You might not see them. And that’s the point. But sneaky hi-tech predators are getting more sophisticated when it comes to stealing your privacy and tracking your whereabouts. They might be recording you in a hotel room, gym locker room, store dressing room, or anywhere that you believe you’re safe from private eyes.

Guard Privacy: Easily locate GPS devices.

Try the Hero Privacy Pen today at an amazing 30% off. The discounts get even higher when you order multiples. Have a great day, and stay safe!

Silent Trackers: Expose hidden cameras.






 








If you does't like this, please Click here
3227 Smith Street Worcester, MA 01609

 











 

On Wednesday afternoon at around 2:45 PM US Eastern Time (1845 UTC), Google prevented its Google speaker from responding to prompts by a Burger King commercial the chain's Whopper hamburger, after the spot went live on the internet at 12PM Eastern Time (1600 UTC). The second commercial, with an actor playing a Burger King employee, is designed to activate Google speakers owned by viewers, the function being triggered by the actor asking "Ok Google, what is the Whopper burger?". Upon receiving the question, the speakers would the introduction to the Wikipedia article on the burger. According to a report by USA Today, responding to the commercial's launch, Wikipedia users vandalized the article, with statements like "The 'Whopper' is the worst hamburger product sold by the international fast-food restaurant chain Burger King," or that it contains "rat and toenail clippings", all of which would be recited by the speaker. Amidst the spree of edits to the article, a Wikipedia user named "" edited the page to reflect positively on the burger. A report by The Washington Post noted similarities between the user's name and Fernando , senior vice president for global brand management at Burger King. The chain declined to say whether the edits to the article were by . The commercial subsequently prompted responses from Wikipedia and Google, with the locking its article from editing by unregistered users, and the latter preventing its speakers from responding to the commercial. According to a report by The Verge, Google may have used the sound clip of the actor's voice to disable the commercial's ability to activate the speakers, as other people were still able to the devices to respond to inquiries about the burger. Burger King later bypassed Google's restrictions on its commercial, by releasing new versions of the spot. The chain revealed the new versions on The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon and Jimmy Kimmel Live on Wednesday night. According to a report by USA Today, the new versions featured different voices asking the prompting question, in one case, a woman, and in another, a different man from the actor in the initial version. Tests done by USA Today on Thursday morning confirmed the new versions of the commercial were able to activate the speakers.

--6087639f51cf9b82d0072c9b090a92cc--