From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Thu Dec 22 10:48:00 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.204]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EpVTn-0003m8-VQ for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:47:58 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so451271nzd for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:47:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GADy3sXV05SJvjC3NOb0ED2nQS7SsEdZGK07HRORSNhG4SroK7oxevveFpm+QaN9u1TJaL9s6MVxSXN2gr8mBAVO+T+tu872rRV2h4vqo2oKNSReGXdvf4iXaNjP9sG0awEFznpp9UFy6hDaRFrzVtIM/UvYR7COQ08SEBGRFjs= Received: by 10.65.59.15 with SMTP id m15mr1060203qbk; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.105.20 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:47:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:47:54 -0500 From: Matt Arnold To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Election of officers concluded In-Reply-To: <20051222182458.GE9783@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051219070640.GB3514@ccil.org> <20051222182458.GE9783@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 27 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On 12/22/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:43:19AM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > > On 12/19/05, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, John Cowan wrote: > > > > > I need a lot more information. What would be done with the money? > > Either things the membership org wanted done with it, or things the > LLG would have done anyways. Things like publishing books. > > We discussed this on IRC at one point, but you kind of disappeared > while I was talking, so I'm not sure how much you saw. > I didn't see any of it. It's been almost the busiest month of my life; fortunately that's over as of this evening. As a consequence I only was able to be on IRC that day long enough to ask the question of what this rumored informal organization idea was all about. I'd like to continue the discussion through e-mail. -epkat