From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jan 02 02:06:45 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Mon, 02 Jan 2006 02:06:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EtMaA-000134-Uv for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 02:06:29 -0800 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 02:06:26 -0800 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Two organizations Message-ID: <20060102100626.GX4087@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20051219070640.GB3514@ccil.org> <43AB97DF.8030703@lojban.org> <20051226195753.GB5289@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Robin Lee Powell Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 41 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:49:16AM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > I don't think the above will be controversial here; having > probably settled that, I would ask this. When someone gets > citizenship in xartum, they are a citizen according to whom, if > not the LLG? The whole point was to have it *not* be the LLG, so that the business affairs of the LLG could be conducted without a large membership confusing things. > According to the administrative settings of The Lojban MOO? > According to me? According to each other? That last one was, in fact, my goal for the new organization, in as much as I have one, since I've disclaimed desire to take part in running the thing. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/