From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jan 03 00:55:28 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:55:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ethwy-0001rO-Of for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:55:24 -0800 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 00:55:24 -0800 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Two organizations Message-ID: <20060103085524.GX4087@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20051226195753.GB5289@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060102042644.GJ4087@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060102173819.GL29659@miranda.org> <43B9C64B.5050805@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B9C64B.5050805@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Robin Lee Powell Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 60 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:33:15PM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Matt Arnold wrote: > >>>We can better spend our time on things that the LLG itself will > >>>do. After all, we're the LLG board, and we're beholden to its > >>>members. Not the future-members of another organization, even > >>>if they are a superset of our own members. > >> > >>Yes, I agree. > > > > There is a good reason that I have been discussing Arnt's > > proposal with the LLG before going straight to the > > beginners-list and lojban-list. This organization, if it is to > > bear any resemblance to the International Esperanto Association, > > I don't think that is what others have in mind. LLG corresponds > to the UEA. The new group corresponds to the rather disorganized > community of Esperantists that identify themselves as such but are > NOT voting members of any formal organization - that group is > MUCH larger than the UEA. No, I really had the UEA in mind for the other org, although I didn't know it until Broca pointed it out. Except without handling money, of course. :-) A somewhat informal UEA, I suppose. [snip stuff that was way too much for me to read; hopefully others are reading it] -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/