From lojbab@lojban.org Mon Jan 09 03:46:08 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eastrmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.240.37])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lojbab@lojban.org>)
	id 1EvvRy-0008SP-50
	for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:45:47 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [24.250.99.39]) by eastrmmtao02.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060109114231.DVGH14821.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@[127.0.0.1]>
          for <llg-board@lojban.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:42:31 -0500
Message-ID: <43C24C98.3080902@lojban.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:44:24 -0500
From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  llg-board@lojban.org
Subject: [llg-board] Re: Quarterly Report for 4Q2005
References: <20060109090100.GC32187@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060109090100.GC32187@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 76
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org
X-list: llg-board

Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> I found the previously known big difference ($134.88) as counter
> deposit made in August of 2004.  I assume this is something Bob did,
> but who knows?

I see email from me to you 8/23-8/24 2004, in which I mentioned that I 
had two checks, and wanted to know what to do with them - that was when 
we discovered that some mail might have gone to the wrong Coleman Ave 
address.  It was at that point where you officially authorized me to 
make deposits on behalf of LLG in case there was any questions.  So I 
did so.

On 9/8 2004 I asked whether I had sent you info on the deposit because I 
couldn't tell.  You said on 9/20 that I had done so.


> Of the remaining difference, about $27 of it came some time in
> February, 2005.  Bob, if you could pull February when you get a
> chance, I'd appreciate.

That's too small to be a book payment, so I would suspect that it was LS 
royalties, possibly two checks worth.  I don't have access to our LS 
account to tell (if I had a paper receipt, it will be hard to find, 
though I probably still have it).

> Other than that, it was a basically uneventful quarter.  No sales
> tax.  Two donations, and a signed CLL sent out in response to one of
> them.

He bought the book and then donated more on top of that.

I do have more transactions to send you but they are after the first of 
the year, so I was waiting for your year-closing before inflicting them 
on you %^)

lojbab