From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Mon Jan 09 14:18:05 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ew5Kz-00024J-Qg for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:18:03 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r28so3429651nza for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:17:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PAY1NHL2DdXkLUfbiOrIQtjRrlk//UK+MobrTOzlNkK3zBfYORPnw7T+yW9JrKIezZDvJmg14cGyny60cnlYiTE9p0rQORZnBwuEd9tHA9ekNK/39XsNIPpELIdEnHBZ/KsLs88S9iKAOIWcVY6T6s/nsJVlphIa7OrtWB5qljw= Received: by 10.65.119.13 with SMTP id w13mr2835587qbm; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.110.14 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:17:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:17:59 -0500 From: Matt Arnold To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Paying for BPFK work (was: Re: Election of officers concluded) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051219070640.GB3514@ccil.org> <20051222182458.GE9783@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060102210908.GL4087@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060109063049.GL4710@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 79 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On 1/9/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:33:18PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen > > wrote: > >> > >> I suggest that you publicise your offer for rewards at the > >> earliest possible occasion. > > > > How broadly? BPFK work is *not* something we want newbies doing. > > So? Can't we just say, "sorry, we don't believe that you are knowledgeable > enough about Lojban" to anyone who tries? > > If you think that would be a problem, I suggest that you post your offer > on lojban-list _in Lojban_. :-) > I concur. -epkat