From arj@nvg.org Sun Jan 15 07:33:37 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ey9sp-0008Ji-Gx for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:33:36 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FE19478A for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:33:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:33:09 +0100 (CET) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Re[2]: Questions, questions... (fwd) In-Reply-To: <20060115040718.GG25000@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: References: <20060115040718.GG25000@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 82 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Is there a difference between this and LLG Projects? > > I don't see one, except for the "who has contributed the most" > thing. There is also a rating system for contributors, the highest level (black) qualifying for LLG membership. In my opinion, the effort of administrating the system would be higher than any possible gain in productivity caused by it. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ The problem is, witchcraft is not fantasy; it is a sinful reality in our world. --christiananswers.net