From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Sat Feb 04 16:57:38 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.92.194])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>)
	id 1F5YDb-0005P2-AR
	for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:57:34 -0800
Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so244854ugc
        for <llg-board@lojban.org>; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=T6XOQEpqrFMbQWtnylUlF5BOBVfLQI8dB7addTyu5afJo9iiUlZU5wfPDQHMxSsy2/DyDJKEtZibV/d82KZ+1DgHyDA7qBJKad+PODsS3+G4WsDsUWHIEU+MebUMyMXaFr1oUFMW02dEVkVs3cn3JmelCx1pmyrUUkWRj2iaJVE=
Received: by 10.48.47.14 with SMTP id u14mr836403nfu;
        Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.51.10 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e6663d200602041657m320332fdh8160427b3654e013@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:57:29 -0800
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: llg-board@lojban.org
Subject: [llg-board] Re: Logfest 2006 at Penguicon
In-Reply-To: <20060204215041.GZ10342@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
References: <e6663d200602010959p6c4399b9ld766925ee36c26c2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <43E2AEA5.2010102@lojban.org>
	 <20060204215041.GZ10342@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 92
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org
X-list: llg-board

On 2/4/06, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:15:17PM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> > Matt Arnold wrote:
>
> > Could you or the Secretary issue a clarification to this effect
> > (and perhaps also suggest that we might be interested in a third
> > one on the West coast as well as one in Europe some time in 2006,
> > so that even more Lojbanists would have a chance for some face to
> > face Lojban time)?
>
> Fine by me.  Let's call it "LogFest@PenguinCon 2006", yeah?
>
> Matt, you're better at this stuff; can you send the followup?
>
> -Robin

How about the following:

coi rodo

For those who are too far away to travel to this particular LogFest
(henceforth unofficially christened as "LogFest@Penguicon 2006"), perhaps it
will inspire you to organize one in your local region or continent! There is
no reason that we can't have multiple LogFests each year. Any opportunity
for Lojban speakers to get some face-to-face time is a wonderful thing. What
do you think, Europeans? What do you think, Californians? Wouldn't that be
great?

-epkat