From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Feb 04 20:34:25 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.240.34]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F5bbO-00030Y-T8 for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:34:22 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [24.250.99.39]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060205043426.TPH14098.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:34:26 -0500 Message-ID: <43E5801E.2020705@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:33:34 -0500 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Logfest 2006 at Penguicon References: <43E2AEA5.2010102@lojban.org> <20060204215041.GZ10342@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 94 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Matt Arnold wrote: > On 2/4/06, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >>On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:15:17PM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote: >> >>>Matt Arnold wrote: >> >>>Could you or the Secretary issue a clarification to this effect >>>(and perhaps also suggest that we might be interested in a third >>>one on the West coast as well as one in Europe some time in 2006, >>>so that even more Lojbanists would have a chance for some face to >>>face Lojban time)? >> >>Fine by me. Let's call it "LogFest@PenguinCon 2006", yeah? >> >>Matt, you're better at this stuff; can you send the followup? >> >>-Robin > > > How about the following: > > coi rodo > > For those who are too far away to travel to this particular LogFest > (henceforth unofficially christened as "LogFest@Penguicon 2006"), perhaps it > will inspire you to organize one in your local region or continent! There is > no reason that we can't have multiple LogFests each year. Any opportunity > for Lojban speakers to get some face-to-face time is a wonderful thing. What > do you think, Europeans? What do you think, Californians? Wouldn't that be > great? I approve, along with Robin's suggested subject line lojbab