From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed May 03 15:20:22 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 03 May 2006 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FbPhk-0000Q1-7p for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 03 May 2006 15:20:20 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:20:20 -0700 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: PLEASE READ: Re: Re: Archivist: PD docs... Which, exactly? Message-ID: <20060503222020.GI17955@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20060424172644.GK2842@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <4457AF02.6040805@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 From: Robin Lee Powell Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 102 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board I don't see a concrete proposal to vote on, I see an RFC. On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:53:30PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > Attention, board members! We are now voting on Bob's proposal on > whether to update the wording of > http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/public_domain.txt . > > On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > Whatever is done, the public domain announcement actually on the > > website should be made current. We shouldn't have a grebyn.com > > or digex email address, or to the Planned Languages Server > > anywhere on the website in any materials someone might think of > > as current rather than archival. > > > If necessary, I move a change to the policy to make it current, > > delegating to the Secretary to actually produce and update the > > text, clarifying as appropriate, and submitting the result to a > > formal vote only because something this fundamental should have > > a formal vote. > > I am of the opinion that these changes are just minor updates, I agree in principle, but I'm not seeing what the proposed changes are *exactly* yet. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/