From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 04 14:29:26 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Thu, 04 May 2006 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FblO0-0000rm-I2 for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 14:29:24 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:29:24 -0700 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Lack of publication of the new board Message-ID: <20060504212924.GB2381@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20060424172644.GK2842@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <4457AF02.6040805@lojban.org> <44593300.5050408@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: Robin Lee Powell Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 107 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:10:47PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2006, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > > I have now reviewed the email traffic and I agree with you, but > > I note that the new officers slate was never announced to the > > membership, and I just had Nora look, and she a) did not know > > that Arnt was President and b) could not find anywhere on the > > website quickly that identified him as president. *OUCH*. That's my fault, as secretary. Sorry. I'm sure we announced it to the member's list, but that's not the same. > > So the officer slate should be somewhere more obvious and it > > should be somehow marked as official (having the list of members > > page labeled as unofficial and user-maintained looks really > > weird - Nora says, even though she realizes that tag is probably > > attached to all pages) > > I apologise for the bad information flow. The page in question has > now been updated with the current slate of officers, though it > still says it is unofficial. I don't know why; it should be > sufficient to put it into the "Official" class. Robin? That is exactly sufficient; or at least it was once upon a time. Hmmmmm. Fixed. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/