From jkominek@miranda.org Wed May 10 07:47:12 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 10 May 2006 07:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miranda.org ([216.93.242.2]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdpy1-0002Gv-0m for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:47:10 -0700 Received: (qmail 13649 invoked by uid 534); 10 May 2006 08:47:07 -0600 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:47:07 -0600 From: Jay F Kominek To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Refund on overdue order requested [kazper20@hotmail.com: Re: the complete lojban language.] Message-ID: <20060510144707.GQ26204@miranda.org> References: <20060509221559.GJ6629@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <446138DA.1050400@lojban.org> <20060510071924.GN6629@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 115 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:41:09AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > Incidentally, how many copies of CLL do we have left from this print run? A bunch. > Do we still like Lightning Source, given the existence of > print-on-demand alternatives such as Lulu.com? Thirty seconds investigation reveals that if you want your book available via Amazon, Lulu uses Lightning Source themselves. Looking at the prices suggests to me that we're doing just fine cutting out the middle man. Lulu is for stupid people. -- Jay Kominek