From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Wed May 10 08:12:25 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FdqMP-0002nq-ML for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:24 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i32so1509574wra for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gclUwIh0u/jYVM2F6V4ZCtBRx3nDb3p3+s4VOkqgNYD4IKwy+zHvZfldoNug+QEnEZbUjgJ8KNIVBTYQUDqY0TWET8KVBL5bd0FSs4/QrCdrJ2SIDsm8SxCoSz5p+ayL6BznTIzqCCygpXr8zaG8BrOiA8jwVVUQbMWxvmlpj4w= Received: by 10.65.59.12 with SMTP id m12mr457781qbk; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.249.4 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:12:19 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Refund on overdue order requested [kazper20@hotmail.com: Re: the complete lojban language.] In-Reply-To: <20060510144707.GQ26204@miranda.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060509221559.GJ6629@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <446138DA.1050400@lojban.org> <20060510071924.GN6629@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20060510144707.GQ26204@miranda.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 116 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board .i di'u xamgu vamji gi'e mutce datni .i ki'e .i ni'o ta'o ru'a do dukse se fanza -epkat On 5/10/06, Jay F Kominek wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:41:09AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > > Incidentally, how many copies of CLL do we have left from this print run? > > A bunch. > > > Do we still like Lightning Source, given the existence of > > print-on-demand alternatives such as Lulu.com? > > Thirty seconds investigation reveals that if you want your book available > via Amazon, Lulu uses Lightning Source themselves. Looking at the prices > suggests to me that we're doing just fine cutting out the middle man. > Lulu is for stupid people. > > -- > Jay Kominek > > >