From lojbab@lojban.org Mon Sep 18 14:03:09 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.240.34]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GPQGf-0007qo-0u for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:03:08 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060918210301.EIMO7951.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:03:01 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([72.192.234.183]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Px2e1V0093y5FKc0000000 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:02:40 -0400 Message-ID: <450F0980.2060507@lojban.org> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:02:56 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Lojban blog References: <20060918165438.GU27480@miranda.org> <20060918185800.GC4610@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <450EFC91.8000702@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 170 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board > There is also the question of naming. I suggest the publication, in > both its online original and its paper reprint, should inherit the > name of the defunct ju'i lobypli. JL may be moribund, but is not officially defunct. We have around 120 subscribers that paid in advance for some number of issues (which were to be quarterly and around 40 pages long), which we should feel obliged to fill or reimburse, even though 12 years means that many of their addresses are probably no longer valid (a post card sent to each address a month before publishing, with the correct postal notation which I think is "return postage guaranteed - address correction requested", possibly with some manual emails to those subscribers we recognize as still being active in the community, would get us as good a list as we can get). I have no problem with the name inheritance, but I want Jay's opinion, and ideally to have the various projects merged by agreement (I suggest that you take a look at other outstanding projects on the projects page, and see if other synergies can lead to more focused efforts). lojbab