From arj@nvg.org Wed Nov 08 04:54:48 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:54:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ghmww-0001WK-Ty for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:54:45 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9089478A for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:54:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:54:15 +0100 (CET) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Lojban at Philcon In-Reply-To: <4551C431.6030304@lojban.org> Message-ID: References: <20061103224551.GI13321@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <454BCD8A.2090306@lojban.org> <454D271D.4040903@lojban.org> <454F8195.6050507@lojban.org> <20061106184455.GZ13321@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <4551C431.6030304@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 235 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:40:21PM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote: >> >>> Matt Arnold wrote: >>> >>>>> Since no one else has done so, and we need to move this along, I >>>>> second the motion, and then call the question so we can get it >>>>> decided. >>> >>> > >>> >>>> I vote in favor. >>>> >>>> -Eppcott >>> >>> I do also. But are any others on the board paying attention, so >>> that a decision can be made? The Philcon people are waiting. >> >> >> In an amusing reversal of my past policy, I proxy my vote to >> Eppcott. >> >> I like to think my reasons in this case are pretty damned good, >> though. > > Jay and Arnt haven't spoken, and no one seems to be chairing this meeting at > the moment. Sorry. There must have been a misunderstanding here. It is my understanding that: a) I am chairing the meeting. b) Having seen no objections to the proposal in a reasonable amount of time, the spending may be considered approved. Also, I did speak, and I voted in favour of spending money for the junior suite. > The Board has been consulted. There are five Board members. Two have voted > in favor of the motion, and Matt has Robin's proxy, and thus can vote a third > vote in favor. I suggest to Matt that if no one objects within a short time > at his discretion, that he consider that he has the votes needed to approve > the spending of LLG money for the suite at Philcon, and thus that he do > precisely what I was criticized for doing when I ran the organization. Seconded. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ I am often asked how radio works. Well, you see, telegraphy is like a very long cat. You yank his tail in New York and he meows in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Now, radio is exactly the same, except that there is no cat. --Attributed to Albert Einstein