From arj@nvg.org Fri Nov 10 10:28:19 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:28:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gib6l-0005fF-Oo for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:28:17 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8E994780; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:27:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:27:43 +0100 (CET) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: Sai Emrys cc: llg-board@lojban.org, lawrence@kli.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: LCS Board of Directors In-Reply-To: <646661980611101010h1077e79cu6e8569799ae4ce87@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <646661980611092145v5b6fb776kda383b3014cea837@mail.gmail.com> <646661980611101010h1077e79cu6e8569799ae4ce87@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 257 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Sai Emrys wrote: > On 11/10/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >> Are you inviting me and Lawrence personally to be on the board, or are you >> suggesting that whoever is the President of the LLG and the director of >> the KLI should also serve on the board of directors of the LCS? > > The former primarily, though we could have an extra chair for other > the acting heads of the LLG and KLI in case those are different. Oh, okay. From the wording of your message, it sounded a bit like the LCS would act as an umbrella organisation of the LLG, the KLI and other organisations of its kin, with our officers serving on the LCS board ex officio. We have had some discussions in the LLG board today about the appropriateness of such a relationship, but this seems a moot point now. Alas, I have no contacts in the other conlang organisations that I mentioned. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Clientside scripting has its place. Its place happens to be somewhere in the lower circles of Hell, but it has it. --heard on IRC