From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Fri Nov 10 10:39:51 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GibHr-0005p8-P3 for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:39:49 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i3so123758wra for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:39:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ktfzgvj1eEjGN95Uvt1u8tbHIJ0AmQhHQWyUAWMAJs5AuvtfMFYZ4SQQ1ddE0Ci4xpWMwIf0gYtvB3XZY6OHwIDxg5HduMCqPMfamBSHeBNQ5mWrYnxFhmDvvSQQvjCw9UepCY5zI5nG7U6TQB2ieSGVHelrLud5ll+AQfC1Rag= Received: by 10.78.127.6 with SMTP id z6mr2865552huc.1163183955787; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.144.3 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:39:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:39:15 -0500 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: LLG meeting during Logfest (Re: Re: LCS Board of Directors (fwd)) In-Reply-To: <20061110181023.GD17734@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4554A4BA.4000907@lojban.org> <20061110174122.GH23121@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20061110181023.GD17734@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 259 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Well, we're there, we might as well meet as long as we had everybody there. I'm sorry, I thought I mentioned this on llg-members on October 24, but all I did was bring up that we had eight of us present and ask how big a percentage that was if we don't count inactive members. I intended to broach the topic once I had that info, and then somehow I got it into my head that it was all straightened out. I hope it's not too late to think about it. Does a meeting of the membership have to be called to order by the President of the Board? Geez, sorry. My bad. -Eppcott On 11/10/06, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 07:06:33PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen > wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Matt Arnold wrote: > > > > >What's AGM? "Annual General Meeting"? Is this a decision that > > >could be made at the LLG meeting taking place at Philcon? > > > > Hm. Oh. *Now* I see that there is an LLG meeting as part of the > > program. > > > > I may have missed it (I'm frightfully absent-minded at times, as > > you are no doubt aware), but when was it decided that there was to > > be a special meeting of the members at Philcon? > > This is also news to me; I thought he just meant the fact that lots > of LLG members would be there. > > -Robin > > -- > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ > Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" > Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ > > >