From arj@nvg.org Fri Nov 10 11:58:19 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:58:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GicVs-0007UA-Nq for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:58:16 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B82C94755 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:57:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:57:54 +0100 (CET) From: Arnt Richard Johansen X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: LCS Board of Directors (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 265 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Sai is pressing the issue of having official LLG representation in his organisation. (Irrelevant parts snipped.) -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Someone just called to say he loved you?! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:38:15 -0800 From: Sai Emrys To: Arnt Richard Johansen Subject: Re: LCS Board of Directors On 11/10/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > For the record, if I join the board, I will serve as a private individual > only, unless explicitly asked to serve as a representative of the LLG. In > which case this arrangement will have to be approved by the Board, and > possibly also the whole membership. Understood. I believe it would however be helpful to have an official representative of the LLG as well. Please take that up with your board. I understand that of course you have your own interests and motivations as the LLG. Let me know what the response is, or any conditions / issues. I would like this new organization to be a meta-organization representing all of conlanging, including all the subcomponents thereof. A unifying force, if you will, while still ensuring that organizations such as LLG, KLI, ELF, etc operate independently with respect to their own missions. I would be opposed to having us be directly involved in issues better handled by the groups of any particular language. (Unclearly worded, but hopefully understandable.) - Sai