From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Sun Nov 12 08:01:43 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjHm3-0000X6-UP for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:01:40 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so793546ugf for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:01:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SvscCDZO0X6BOB5ez0XZUrUIGc/S3LLEszMtdIQ2SBNrjkhntPFscWOGbM8FbEIixADKzJDW1eealJ42RR9GkaDbPLAjXrmrC86YaMkeXQaZ6ts2uygCf1UPRLu3OW8p8e1D+5mi9uwJkeDhenqpWBxqz+mmkeEwY5MipAitrEw= Received: by 10.78.21.7 with SMTP id 7mr5096137huu.1163347293288; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.144.3 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:01:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:01:32 -0500 From: "Matt Arnold" To: "Sai Emrys" Subject: [llg-board] Re: LCS Board of Directors (fwd) Cc: llg-board@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <646661980611101335s254dfde3se564ee83a761383b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <646661980611101335s254dfde3se564ee83a761383b@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 270 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Sai, I'm told that you have been pressing the issue of official representation of the LLG in your organization. Toward what end do you want that? What would be the responsibilities and the priviledges of LLG toward LCS and vice-versa? -Matt