From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Fri Aug 03 11:31:42 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IH1vz-0001Uj-0Y for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:31:41 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EA494787 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:31:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l73IVDO7005176 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:31:13 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l73IVDrm005175 for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:31:13 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:31:13 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Translating "What Is Lojban?" Into Hindi Message-ID: <20070803183113.GA31755@nvg.org> References: <20070802203248.GI18057@nvg.org> <20070803001716.GR12963@miranda.org> <46B35DC1.1070304@lojban.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 317 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:01:13PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > Thanks, Lojbab. This is a lot of info that I didn't have. In my view, > it is a good reason not to pursue this project at this time. > > The membership meeting you refer to can be held online, can it not? Absolutely. It is routinely held by e-mail vote. The reasons why it hasn't been held yet is, in order of importance: a) my general tardiness, and preoccupation with my new job; b) the idea that it is more productive to hold the meeting in autumn, when fewer people are on holiday. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule. Ice is cool.