From lojbab@lojban.org Tue Aug 07 19:04:12 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.240.9]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IIau5-0000bu-Vi for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:04:10 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070808020358.SXCY10435.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:03:58 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([72.192.234.183]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id ZE3w1X00M3y5FKc0000000; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:03:58 -0400 Message-ID: <46B92503.2040408@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:05:55 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Immediate Action Needed on CLL Shipping References: <20070722191247.GA26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B8E7B2.4060405@lojban.org> <20070807214749.GB26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B8EF16.20507@lojban.org> <20070807230923.GG26253@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20070807230923.GG26253@digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 326 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:15:50PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > >>Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> >>>Given that I'm just going to vote to do whatever you say, can I >>>stop reading at this point? >> >>Fine, but note that I gave ***you*** an option to make a friendly >>amendment to offer an intermediate rate for Mexico halfway between >>the Canada rate and the rest of the world, depending on how much >>work it would take, given the exactly one order that I think we've >>ever gotten from Mexico. Otherwise they pay the higher rate. > > > It's no (additional) work at all on my end; how much is it on yours? None. If they pay for Mexico and they live in Mexico, I don't worry about how much they paid. If this means you propose the friendly amendment, I accept. lojbab