From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Aug 08 10:16:30 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IIp92-0003Z7-Ts for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:16:29 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:16:28 -0700 To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Immediate Action Needed on CLL Shipping Message-ID: <20070808171628.GL26253@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20070722191247.GA26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B8E7B2.4060405@lojban.org> <20070807214749.GB26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B8EF16.20507@lojban.org> <20070807230923.GG26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B92503.2040408@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B92503.2040408@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 329 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:05:55PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:15:50PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier > >wrote: > > > >>Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >> > >>>Given that I'm just going to vote to do whatever you say, can I > >>>stop reading at this point? > >> > >>Fine, but note that I gave ***you*** an option to make a > >>friendly amendment to offer an intermediate rate for Mexico > >>halfway between the Canada rate and the rest of the world, > >>depending on how much work it would take, given the exactly one > >>order that I think we've ever gotten from Mexico. Otherwise > >>they pay the higher rate. > > > > > >It's no (additional) work at all on my end; how much is it on > >yours? > > None. If they pay for Mexico and they live in Mexico, I don't > worry about how much they paid. > > If this means you propose the friendly amendment, I accept. Indeed. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/