From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Aug 26 00:37:53 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IPCgw-0000Ib-RQ for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:37:51 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:37:50 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: LLG AGM 2007: proper notice? Message-ID: <20070826073750.GM4335@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20070826063504.GB31755@nvg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070826063504.GB31755@nvg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-archive-position: 332 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 08:35:04AM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > Did we agree that e-mail counts as proper notice per the LLG > bylaws? Proper notice of what? Of the meeting time and place, yes, certainly. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/