From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Sat Oct 06 05:15:18 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ie8YV-0002ja-Fi for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:15:13 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m16so941786waf for ; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:14:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dOonouTBK8yH+0q1HrxKiPLzVnJM2jvPW20xKVPdpGc=; b=nxOeiB8kGSMAS4jRxL/i+k+rklDduSo5S+Qdz7qH+dOP2eo3RIDflfLsFQvmuzRTugXbwktJ/UGMrL2l95AUxpI2JM8Wdb3N/AbMLNhCyMz4ua2y6eg3I4/O2ES1ROGZ2PSvFFUMDeVr3xFuiyYV8jHBMW+d0alSO8a2yy5bebc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R6HIb9O6YDl9o/D0kFD5Nbgh3dl+4/rikejk5GdoNHnz2LPsX7qOXm1+G8Qk3ImMut+QMTYWRH+GdoLa8nmklZkxoP+7vpUW07VDC4psy3LOMjC/oZj5DcAiGWUaIInSYaBhQu0lJVHi2Ruobz9nydrTMUMOFhdEI7+Lu5qsc48= Received: by 10.114.167.2 with SMTP id p2mr1881027wae.1191672873036; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.16.20 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:14:32 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: Immediate Action Needed on CLL Shipping In-Reply-To: <4706B491.8010909@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070722191247.GA26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B8E7B2.4060405@lojban.org> <20070807214749.GB26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B8EF16.20507@lojban.org> <20070807230923.GG26253@digitalkingdom.org> <46B92503.2040408@lojban.org> <20070808171628.GL26253@digitalkingdom.org> <4706B491.8010909@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 335 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On 10/5/07, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:05:55PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > > >>Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >> > >>>On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:15:50PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier > >>>wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Given that I'm just going to vote to do whatever you say, can I > >>>>>stop reading at this point? > >>>> > >>>>Fine, but note that I gave ***you*** an option to make a > >>>>friendly amendment to offer an intermediate rate for Mexico > >>>>halfway between the Canada rate and the rest of the world, > >>>>depending on how much work it would take, given the exactly one > >>>>order that I think we've ever gotten from Mexico. Otherwise > >>>>they pay the higher rate. > >>> > >>> > >>>It's no (additional) work at all on my end; how much is it on > >>>yours? > >> > >>None. If they pay for Mexico and they live in Mexico, I don't > >>worry about how much they paid. > >> > >>If this means you propose the friendly amendment, I accept. > > My motion was proposed almost 2 months ago, and there appears to have > been no objection, but there has also been no vote, and no rate increase > I notice that the Mexico option was added to the website, but my > original motion was made because the other shipping costs no longer > covered costs. > > I just sent 3 books overseas with postage costs higher than what we > collected. Both UPS books also exceeded in costs what we charged for > shipping, even though they were fairly close destinations. Can we have a > vote on my motion or a declaration that it is approved and needs to be > implemented? > > lojbab > > I second Bob's motion and vote in favor of it. -Eppcott