From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Fri Aug 29 12:36:02 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KZ9lH-00004w-0U; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:36:02 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE32894783; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m7TJZJv3021677; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:29 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id m7TJZI5V021676; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:18 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:18 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: LakMeer Kravid Cc: lojban@lojban.org, llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: byfy taskmaster Message-ID: <20080829193518.GD16391@nvg.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 394 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 05:13:57PM +1200, LakMeer Kravid wrote: > I'll volunteer for this post. I spend at least some time every day > thinking about or working with lojban, and I'm still motivated to keep > at it for a long time. I've even been considering making this proposal > on my own initiative. Thank you for your interest. I am pleased to let you know that we have decided to offer you this position. Please have a look at http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=BPFK%20Checkpoints . The current checkpoint, Attitudinals, is stalled due to a disagreement over Irrealis Attitudinals. At your option, you may postpone this checheckpoint and get the commissioners started on another, or you may urge the commissioners to rework Irrealis Attitudinals into something that is acceptable to all. You need to be a member of the wikichanges and wikidiscuss mailing lists if you aren't already; Robin will help you with that. If you have any questions, please let me know. -- Arnt Richard Johansen Vice President Logical Language Group, Inc.