From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Mon Sep 22 09:45:46 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KhoXc-0007gR-5Z for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:45:46 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3021D94795 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:44:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m8MGit4b002540 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:44:55 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id m8MGitFI002539 for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:44:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:44:54 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: OK, I can no longer stand it. Message-ID: <20080922164454.GT2447@nvg.org> References: <20080922020611.GE7580@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080922020611.GE7580@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 408 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 07:06:11PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I'm sick of having my webserver (aka lojban.org, kli.org, and a few > other places) take up all my bandwidth. I'd like discretion to by > hosting at my discretion, with the understanding that: > > 1. I (and hopefully others!) will engage in routine donations to > make up for the costs. (It's a *hell* of a tax break, people.) > > 2. I (and maybe others) will be using the server for non-Lojbanic > things, which will not compromise the server or the LLG in any way. > > What say you? I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Are you planning for the LLG to chip in on the server costs, or are you planning to basically continue to run lojban.org as a donation, except now it's tax-deductible? -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Rad: Nei, de er pene p� innsiden. Paa innsiden har de kjoett og organer og slikt. Det er ikke pent.