From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 15 13:26:13 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Fri, 15 May 2009 13:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M53yu-0000pu-UD for llg-board@lojban.org; Fri, 15 May 2009 13:26:13 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:26:12 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: [bmer@loc.gov: U.S. Copyright Office / Mandatory deposit notice 257810] Message-ID: <20090515202612.GB16051@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20090211210726.GF31130@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-archive-position: 512 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Did this happen? -Robin On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:13:31PM -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > Robin, > > I don't have WiL, but I will ship them two copies of CLL next week. > > -Matt > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > > > Apparently we owe them *two* copies *each* of both the CLL and What > > Is Lojban?. > > > > Neat. > > > > Matt, can you handle the CLL? If you have 2 copies of WiL lying > > around you could send, that would be extra-awesome (I hate posting > > things), otherwise I'll do it. > > > > -Robin > > > > -- > > They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." > > And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something > > other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre > > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: "Bernard A Mercer" > > To: lojban@lojban.org > > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:54:54 -0500 > > Subject: U.S. Copyright Office / Mandatory deposit notice 257810 > > Logical Language Group > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > As I mentioned, I am contacting the Logical Language Group now because our office had not received a response to the mandatory deposit notice which was issued in August of 2008. The statutory deadline was November 17, 2008. > > > > I trust that this matter can be expedited, so that our office does not have to take further action. > > > > I am attaching a pdf file copy of the mandatory deposit notice, the notice letter and Circular 7d. Please return a copy of the mandatory deposit notice with the books. Send package address to my attention at the address that appears in the upper left corner of the notice. > > > > Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > Bernard > > > > Bernard A. Mercer, Copyright Acquisitions Librarian > > Library of Congress > > U.S. Copyright Office > > 101 Independence Avenue, S.E., LM 524 > > Washington, D.C. 20559-6600 > > > > 202-707-9452, voice > > 202-707-4435, fax > > Email: bmer@loc.gov > > > > -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/