From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Wed Sep 02 13:34:02 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MiwWd-00015f-4y for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:34:02 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4B0947AA for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:24:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n82KOkSV006894 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:24:46 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n82KOg4c006893 for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:24:42 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:24:41 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: BPFK taskmaster, what's up? Message-ID: <20090902202441.GO5073@nvg.org> References: <20090304183012.GJ7405@nvg.org> <20090317115754.GZ7405@nvg.org> <20090407192331.GE14088@nvg.org> <20090902192912.GL5073@nvg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 550 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:38:01PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > I volunteer to serve as cat-herder. > > I know I failed a couple of years ago, but it will be different now > for several reasons. If you hadn't sent that last e-mail where you proposed to delete lots of selma'o, I would have been all for it. (Provided we let Lakmeer go in an appropriately courteous manner.) But now, I'm a bit more sceptical. I think your proposal will fall, of course. But both as a director (because I would like the BPFK to proceed) and as a commissioner (because I would like BPFK to proceed _in the right direction_), I need assurance that you will lead the BPFK in a hands-off manner. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Evan, a Quiz Bowl reject, nevertheless knows more than what's good for him. The son of deposed royalty from some obscure nation whose name is probably only known to himself, Evan is the life of the party when the party's over. -- Leon Lin: Kissing the Buddha's Feet