From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Wed Sep 09 12:24:32 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlSmI-0006OM-PE for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:24:32 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D9694783 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:23:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n89JNqmJ017100 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:23:52 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n89JNkKm017099 for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:23:46 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:23:46 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] Re: BPFK taskmaster, what's up? Message-ID: <20090909192346.GP2685@nvg.org> References: <20090304183012.GJ7405@nvg.org> <20090317115754.GZ7405@nvg.org> <20090407192331.GE14088@nvg.org> <20090902192912.GL5073@nvg.org> <20090902202441.GO5073@nvg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 552 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board Oops. I thought I had responded to this one. Evidently I did not. Sorry. On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 03:15:47AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > As I understand it, the job consists of checking once a week if any > progress has been made on BPFK's current section. If yes, do nothing. > If no, the taskmaster picks a new section for the BPFK to work on. If > the section that we are leaving has a concrete issue to vote on, the > taskmaster calls a vote, with a voting deadline three days later. > > That's what I volunteered for. Let me know if my description can be > carried out in a way you would consider too hands-on. If you're > worried that I had a larger role in mind, I can reassure you on that > score. Yes, that is reassuring. I think the way to go about this is to tell Lakmeer that we have someone who is interested in taking over in his job, and he should decide if he still wants it. And if he wants the job, he should start doing it ASAP. Opinions? -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Evan, a Quiz Bowl reject, nevertheless knows more than what's good for him. The son of deposed royalty from some obscure nation whose name is probably only known to himself, Evan is the life of the party when the party's over. -- Leon Lin: Kissing the Buddha's Feet