From matt.mattarn@gmail.com Wed Sep 09 12:29:31 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f192.google.com ([209.85.211.192]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlSr5-0006g5-Qo for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:29:30 -0700 Received: by ywh30 with SMTP id 30so53815ywh.25 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tEVoeBkUNGS8rqWdTw0fKrOLZlbaAQ0a+ORnzsOadWI=; b=AK+YQaASyElSsC7q8Defjvqgb0vm9162mS/D1E4sYSRrr/mYTi6ILZTZjOqI5kiy9r z7Y4B7KI3+SldE/wompa/p9XaMzRmkC8rT5FCxcPPDK9ckUoVj2gfkE5xEIk0zm7dwdl 1BqtB1UTDduY7dPTs2hyeMgKuwHhHaQABkC1c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RQmWuAcaJKXE0mMpVDHqqTDykTeK9xzPdWB1e2Lj2AAuicc+KaDkqLJGlVsiKmcN3D HP3tVf8viMWUSidD/frGHj3yKzxlBTFvLnxiOHTIwLdCemUHzEnUbRE7sZXCGiFM+ZTe rNUFZb6DA5AcKlvfnWeBiixd7LsENZJ9A+5Js= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.213.18 with SMTP id l18mr1127199ybg.183.1252524557530; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090909192346.GP2685@nvg.org> References: <20090304183012.GJ7405@nvg.org> <20090317115754.GZ7405@nvg.org> <20090407192331.GE14088@nvg.org> <20090902192912.GL5073@nvg.org> <20090902202441.GO5073@nvg.org> <20090909192346.GP2685@nvg.org> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:29:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [llg-board] Re: BPFK taskmaster, what's up? From: Matt Arnold To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-archive-position: 553 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board > I think the way to go about this is to tell Lakmeer that we have someone who is interested in taking over in his job, and he should decide if he still wants it. And if he wants the job, he should start doing it ASAP. > > Opinions? I support this. Of course, we should add in the email to him the date by which we would need him to respond if he still wants the job. I volunteer to send the email. -Matt