From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Sun Oct 04 06:41:13 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MuRKm-0005EA-25 for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:41:13 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEFE94789 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:40:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n94DeUFV020166 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:40:31 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n94DePik020165 for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:40:25 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:40:25 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org Subject: [llg-board] "Community edited version" of CLL uploaded to the wiki Message-ID: <20091004134024.GA3835@nvg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 566 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board From IRC: 15:30 < remod> sorry was meant for florolf. But if you are interested, I've attached the CLL PDF to the lojban.org page: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/The+Complete+Lojban+Language 15:30 < remod> there's also a "single htnl page" versio 15:30 < remod> version* 1) Did anyone approve this? 2) Doesn't this count as a modified version of CLL, for which permission to distribute is required? 3) Even if it is a "verbatim copy" as required by the licence, and it is legal to distribute, should _we_ do the distributing? I think it is unfortunate that there now exists a version of the CLL that is superior to the printed version, but now that the worms are out of the can, just pulling the files off the site may not be a good move. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Så mange ord som mulig per gram var utvelgelsesgrunnlaget da bøkene skulle plukkes ut. --Erling Kagge: Alene til Sydpolen