From arj@nvg.ntnu.no Sun Oct 04 10:23:02 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list llg-board); Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MuUnP-0006Qz-N2 for llg-board@lojban.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:23:01 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8656094787; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:22:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n94HMOgs022424; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:22:24 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n94HMHJ3022423; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:22:17 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:22:17 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: llg-board@lojban.org, John Cowan Subject: [llg-board] Re: "Community edited version" of CLL uploaded to the wiki Message-ID: <20091004172217.GD3835@nvg.org> References: <20091004134024.GA3835@nvg.org> <4AC8C7F4.4060002@lojban.org> <20091004170556.GC3835@nvg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091004170556.GC3835@nvg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-archive-position: 570 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: llg-board-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: llg-board@lojban.org X-list: llg-board To recapitulate, for John: Someone called "remod" on both IRC and the wiki have uploaded a version of the CLL that is based on the draft reference grammar with the approved errata incorporated, but does not "clearly mark" the modifications, as required by the licence. On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 07:05:56PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 12:06:12PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > > Whoever posted it should be negotiated with, however, to ensure that > > s/he knows why we pulled it. > > FYI: I've removed the files. I think I have made our position clear to remod. Remod claims to have discussed this "in the chat" with Robin and John, and come to some sort of understanding. Do you have any recollection of this? -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ I know, I know. I could write a whole book about procrastination, but who has the time? -- Mark Shoulson